Linda Chesterton
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 14
-
- Tendon Structure and Treatment 8
- Sports injuries and prevention 5
- Cell Biology top 2%
-
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment 13
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 11
-
- Peripheral Nerve Disorders 9
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 8
-
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 6
- Co-authors
- Nadine E. FosterChristine WrightJulius SimPanos BarlasDavid BaxterDaniëlle van der WindtClaire BurtonLeica S. Claydon
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Linda Chesterton
41 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Pharmacology 863
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 231
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 353
- Cell Biology 468
- Complementary and Manual Therapy 60
Countries citing papers authored by Linda Chesterton
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Chesterton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Chesterton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Chesterton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Chesterton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Chesterton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Chesterton. The network helps show where Linda Chesterton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Linda Chesterton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 34 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 62 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 58 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 70 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 67 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 54 | |
| 18 | Interrater Reliability of Algometry in Measuring Pressure Pain Thresholds in Healthy Humans, Using Multiple Ratersbreakdown → | 2007 | 541 |
| 19 | 2003 | 145 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 120 |
About Linda Chesterton
Linda Chesterton is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pharmacology and Rehabilitation, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (14 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (13 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (11 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (9 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (8 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (6 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (863 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (231 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (353 citations). Linda Chesterton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Nadine E. Foster, Christine Wright, Julius Sim, Panos Barlas, David Baxter, Daniëlle van der Windt, Claire Burton, Leica S. Claydon, Ying Chen and Edward Roddy. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Physiotherapy, Lara D. Veeken, Clinical Journal of Pain and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.