Julius Sim
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 0.1%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- General Health Professions top 0.1%
Papers in
- Pharmacology 54
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 53
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 16
- Co-authors
- Chris WrightJackie WaterfieldBenjamin SaundersTom KingstoneBernadette BartlamClare JinksHeather BurroughsMartyn Lewis
- Journals
- Physiotherapy (14 papers)Physical Therapy (7 papers)Pain (6 papers)Clinical Journal of Pain (6 papers)PLoS ONE (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Julius Sim
189 papers receiving 18.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- Pharmacology 2.6k
- General Health Professions 3.8k
- Health 1.3k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.1k
- Occupational Therapy 465
Countries citing papers authored by Julius Sim
This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Sim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Sim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Sim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Sim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Sim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Sim. The network helps show where Julius Sim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julius Sim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 9 | COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 536 |
| 10 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 179 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 125 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 16 | Research in health care : concepts, designs and methods | 2000 | 340 |
| 17 | Johnstone MJ, Bioethics: a nursing perspective | 1996 | 1 |
| 18 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 7 |
About Julius Sim
Julius Sim is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health, Occupational Therapy and Health, having authored 197 papers that have together received 19.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (53 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (23 papers), Ethics in medical practice (18 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (16 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (14 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (13 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (10 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (2.6k citations), General Health Professions (3.8k citations), Health (1.3k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (2.1k citations) and Occupational Therapy (465 citations). Julius Sim has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Chris Wright, Jackie Waterfield, Benjamin Saunders, Tom Kingstone, Bernadette Bartlam, Clare Jinks, Heather Burroughs, Martyn Lewis, Christine Wright and Linda Chesterton. Their work appears in journals such as Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Pain, Clinical Journal of Pain and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.