Joie Ensor

12.3k citations
66 papers · 5.1k indexed · 8 hit papers · h-index 25

Joie Ensor

61 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Hit Papers

Evaluation of c...10220162026201920224008001.2k

Peers

Joie Ensor
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • Health Informatics 191
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 465
  • Internal Medicine 180
  • Statistics and Probability 388
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 182
Replace Kym I E Snell with:
Kym I E Snell United Kingdom
Nirav R. Shah United States
Joris A. H. de Groot Netherlands
Thomas P. A. Debray Netherlands
Karel G. M. Moons Netherlands
Maarten van Smeden Netherlands
Frank W. Rockhold United States
Thomas Agoritsas Switzerland
Robert Wolff United Kingdom
Matthew Sperrin United Kingdom
Joie Ensor relative to Kym I E Snell United Kingdom Kym I E Snell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kym I E Snell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joie Ensor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joie Ensor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joie Ensor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joie Ensor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joie Ensor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joie Ensor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joie Ensor. The network helps show where Joie Ensor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joie Ensor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joie Ensor Line = papers co-authored together Joie Ensor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20255
3 20252
4 20250
5 20240
6
Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 2): how to undertake an external validation studybreakdown →
2024102
7 20240
8 202346
9 20231
10 202326
11 20231
12 202156
13 202165
14 202134
15 202087
16
Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II ‐ binary and time‐to‐event outcomesbreakdown →
2018581
17 201715
18
A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performancebreakdown →
2017402
19 201545
20 201418

About Joie Ensor

Joie Ensor is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Statistics and Probability and Internal Medicine, having authored 66 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (31 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (17 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (11 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (8 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (7 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (7 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (6 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (191 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (465 citations) and Internal Medicine (180 citations). Joie Ensor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard D Riley, Kym I E Snell, Gary S. Collins, Karel G.M. Moons, Frank E. Harrell, Thomas P. A. Debray, Danielle Burke, Johannes B. Reitsma, Maarten van Smeden and Glen P. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Statistics in Medicine, BMJ, Research Synthesis Methods, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and Statistical Methods in Medical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026