Carol Vance

44 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Carol Vance's Hit Papers

Using Tens for Pain Control: The State of the Evidence 2014 · 302 citations
3020+4+8Years since publication100200300

Peers

Carol Vance
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 216
  • Pharmacology 459
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 292
  • Physiology 475
  • Neurology 119
Replace Annina B. Schmid with:
Annina B. Schmid United Kingdom
Linda Chesterton United Kingdom
Elena K. Krumova Germany
Andrea Polli Belgium
Paolo Marchettini Italy
Mark J. Catley Australia
Richard Eloin Liebano Brazil
Guillaume Léonard Canada
Dana L. Dailey United States
Iris Coppieters Belgium
Carol Vance relative to Annina B. Schmid United Kingdom Annina B. Schmid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Annina B. Schmid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carol Vance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carol Vance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carol Vance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carol Vance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carol Vance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carol Vance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carol Vance. The network helps show where Carol Vance may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Carol Vance, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carol Vance Line = papers co-authored together Carol Vance links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Using Tens for Pain Control: The State of the Evidence
Hit paper breakdown →
2014302
2 2008258
3 2013190
4 2007150
5 2012138
6 2009106
7 2010100
8 200599
9 201196
10 201979
11 202262
12 201444
13 201843
14 201436
15 201636
16 201636
17 200736
18 201735
19 201329
20 198625

About Carol Vance

Carol Vance is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (17 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (15 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (216 citations), Pharmacology (459 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (292 citations), Physiology (475 citations) and Neurology (119 citations). Carol Vance has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen A. Sluka, Barbara A. Rakel, Dana L. Dailey, Deirdre Walsh, Tammy L. Lisi, Josimari Melo DeSantana, Richard Eloin Liebano, Leslie J. Crofford, Yümi Maeda and Ruth L. Chimenti. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain, Pain, Physical Therapy, Journal of Pain Research and Arthritis Research & Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact