Carol Vance

46 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Carol Vance's Hit Papers

Using Tens for Pain Control: The State of the Evidence 2014 · 316 citations
3160+4+8Years since publication100200300

Peers

Carol Vance
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 240
  • Pharmacology 485
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 320
  • Physiology 509
  • Neurology 132
Replace Claudia Schaub with:
Claudia Schaub Germany
Linda S. Chesterton United Kingdom
Claudia Rolko Germany
Mark J. Catley Australia
Paolo Marchettini Italy
Richard Eloin Liebano Brazil
Dana L. Dailey United States
Luke Parkitny United States
Iris Coppieters Belgium
Gunnar B. Wallin Sweden
Carol Vance relative to Claudia Schaub Germany Claudia Schaub's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Claudia Schaub · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carol Vance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carol Vance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carol Vance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carol Vance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carol Vance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carol Vance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carol Vance. The network helps show where Carol Vance may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Carol Vance, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carol Vance Line = papers co-authored together Carol Vance links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Using Tens for Pain Control: The State of the Evidence
Hit paper breakdown →
2014316
2 2008282
3 2013196
4 2007161
5 2012141
6 2009110
7 2005105
8 2010104
9 201198
10 201984
11 202271
12 202356
13 201445
14 201843
15 200739
16 201638
17 201738
18 201437
19 201637
20 198631

About Carol Vance

Carol Vance is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (19 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (15 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (12 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (240 citations), Pharmacology (485 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (320 citations), Physiology (509 citations) and Neurology (132 citations). Carol Vance has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen Anne Sluka, Barbara A. Rakel, Dana L. Dailey, Deirdre M. J. Walsh, Tammy L. Lisi, Josimari Melo DeSantana, Richard Eloin Liebano, Leslie Crofford, Yümi Maeda and Ruth L. Chimenti. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain, Pain, Physical Therapy, Arthritis Research & Therapy and Journal of Pain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact