Liesbeth van Vliet
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Jozien M. BensingIan FletcherMichela RimondiniMaria Angela MazziFrancesca MorettiChrista ZimmermannGiuseppe DeleddaSandra van Dulmen
- Topics
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers)Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Liesbeth van Vliet
14 papers receiving 693 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- General Health Professions 300
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 226
- Psychiatry and Mental health 120
- Clinical Psychology 108
- Sociology and Political Science 106
Countries citing papers authored by Liesbeth van Vliet
This map shows the geographic impact of Liesbeth van Vliet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liesbeth van Vliet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liesbeth van Vliet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liesbeth van Vliet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liesbeth van Vliet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liesbeth van Vliet. The network helps show where Liesbeth van Vliet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liesbeth van Vliet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liesbeth van Vliet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liesbeth van Vliet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liesbeth van Vliet. Liesbeth van Vliet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 85 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countriesbreakdown → | 312 |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 56 | |
| 14 | 28 |
About Liesbeth van Vliet
Liesbeth van Vliet is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (29 citations), General Health Professions (300 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (120 citations). Liesbeth van Vliet has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jozien M. Bensing, Ian Fletcher, Michela Rimondini, Maria Angela Mazzi, Francesca Moretti, Christa Zimmermann, Giuseppe Deledda, Sandra van Dulmen, Myriam Deveugele and Mara van Osch. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, BMJ Open and Palliative Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.