Liang Yap
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 1%
- Co-authors
- Mark H. PollackMichael W. OttoRobert A. GouldRichard N. JonesSharon K. InouyeTamara G. FongEdward R. MarcantonioFrances M. Yang
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers)Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineAnesthesiology and Pain MedicineDevelopmental Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Liang Yap
16 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 531
- Clinical Psychology 489
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 429
- Psychiatry and Mental health 380
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 301
Countries citing papers authored by Liang Yap
This map shows the geographic impact of Liang Yap's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liang Yap with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liang Yap more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liang Yap
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liang Yap. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liang Yap. The network helps show where Liang Yap may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liang Yap
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liang Yap. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liang Yap based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liang Yap. Liang Yap is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 158 | |
| 4 | 157 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Assessing depression and factors possibly associated with depression during the course of Parkinson's disease. | 9 |
| 7 | 149 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 345 | |
| 11 | 76 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 212 | |
| 15 | 291 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 37 |
About Liang Yap
Liang Yap is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (531 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (301 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (217 citations). Liang Yap has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark H. Pollack, Michael W. Otto, Robert A. Gould, Richard N. Jones, Sharon K. Inouye, Tamara G. Fong, Edward R. Marcantonio, Frances M. Yang, James L. Rudolph and Dan K. Kiely. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.