Deborah Blacker

36.2k citations
188 papers · 22.1k indexed · 5 hit papers · h-index 57

Deborah Blacker

180 papers receiving 21.8k citations

Hit Papers

Classifying neurocognitive disorders...65319982026200720162.5k5.0k7.5k

Peers

Deborah Blacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 7.3k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 9.0k
  • Neurology 2.0k
  • Physiology 5.8k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 4.5k
Replace Kewei Chen with:
Kewei Chen United States
Gaël Chételat France
Julie C. Price United States
Stefan Teipel Germany
Adam M. Brickman United States
Bradford C. Dickerson United States
Andrew J. Saykin United States
Prashanthi Vemuri United States
Sterling C. Johnson United States
Peter J. Snyder United States
Deborah Blacker relative to Kewei Chen United States Kewei Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kewei Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Blacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Blacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Blacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Blacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Blacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Blacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Blacker. The network helps show where Deborah Blacker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Blacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Blacker Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Blacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20251
4 20251
5 20243
6 20240
7 20240
8 20235
9 202312
10 20235
11 20222
12 20226
13 202139
14 201911
15 20187
16 20175
17 201672
18 201645
19 2015118
20 201546

About Deborah Blacker

Deborah Blacker is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Physiology, having authored 188 papers that have together received 22.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (89 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (42 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (27 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (21 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (15 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (12 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (11 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (7.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (9.0k citations) and Neurology (2.0k citations). Deborah Blacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn Albert, Bradley T. Hyman, Ronald Killiany, Bradford C. Dickerson, Bruce Fischl, Anders M. Dale, Rahul S. Desikan, Brian T. Quinn, R. P. Maguire and Randy L. Buckner. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Neurology, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Genetic Epidemiology and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026