Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Applied Psychology
- Co-authors
- Philip NewallPeter AytonEmmanouil KonstantinidisNigel HarveyMaarten SpeekenbrinkLukasz WalasekHenrik SingmannElliot A. Ludvig
- Topics
- Gambling Behavior and Treatments (10 papers)Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (5 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)
- Journals
- CognitionInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen
21 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Clinical Psychology 106
- Sociology and Political Science 64
- General Decision Sciences 50
- Economics and Econometrics 41
- Applied Psychology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen
This map shows the geographic impact of Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen. The network helps show where Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen. Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen
Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (10 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (50 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations) and Clinical Psychology (106 citations). Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip Newall, Peter Ayton, Emmanouil Konstantinidis, Nigel Harvey, Maarten Speekenbrink, Lukasz Walasek, Henrik Singmann, Elliot A. Ludvig, Volker Thoma and Petra Filkuková. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.