Leonardo Luíz Borges
- Plant Science top 10%
- Food Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Edemilson Cardoso da ConceiçãoElisa Flávia Luiz Cardoso BailãoIvano Alessandro DevillaDâmaris SilveiraJosé Realino de PaulaPedro Henrique FerriJoelma Abadia Marciano de PaulaMaria Teresa Freitas Bara
- Topics
- Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (25 papers)Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (23 papers)Insect Pest Control Strategies (9 papers)
- Cited by
- BiochemistryFood ScienceForestry
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFood ChemistryInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
In The Last Decade
Leonardo Luíz Borges
92 papers receiving 761 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Plant Science 328
- Food Science 284
- Molecular Biology 185
- Biochemistry 157
- Pharmacology 75
Countries citing papers authored by Leonardo Luíz Borges
This map shows the geographic impact of Leonardo Luíz Borges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonardo Luíz Borges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonardo Luíz Borges more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leonardo Luíz Borges
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonardo Luíz Borges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonardo Luíz Borges. The network helps show where Leonardo Luíz Borges may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leonardo Luíz Borges
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leonardo Luíz Borges. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leonardo Luíz Borges based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leonardo Luíz Borges. Leonardo Luíz Borges is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Influence of environmental factors on the composition of essential oils from leaves of Myrcia tomentosa (Aubl.) DC. | 5 |
About Leonardo Luíz Borges
Leonardo Luíz Borges is a scholar working on Drug Discovery, Forestry and Food Science, having authored 104 papers that have together received 788 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (25 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (23 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (157 citations), Food Science (284 citations) and Forestry (59 citations). Leonardo Luíz Borges has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Hungary and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Edemilson Cardoso da Conceição, Elisa Flávia Luiz Cardoso Bailão, Ivano Alessandro Devilla, Dâmaris Silveira, José Realino de Paula, Pedro Henrique Ferri, Joelma Abadia Marciano de Paula, Maria Teresa Freitas Bara, Tatiana de Sousa Fiuza and Heleno Dias Ferreira. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Food Chemistry and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.