Leanne Fray

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
32 papers, 729 citations indexed

About

Leanne Fray is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Leanne Fray has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 729 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Education, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Leanne Fray's work include Education Systems and Policy (13 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (7 papers) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (7 papers). Leanne Fray is often cited by papers focused on Education Systems and Policy (13 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (7 papers) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (7 papers). Leanne Fray collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Leanne Fray's co-authors include Jennifer Gore, Jessica Harris, Andrew Miller, Kathryn Holmes, Elena Prieto, Max Smith, Natasha Weaver, Adam Lloyd, Peter Brown and Lois Bryson and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Teaching and Teacher Education and Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Leanne Fray

31 papers receiving 702 citations

Hit Papers

Why people choose teaching: A scoping review of empirical... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 40 80 120

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Leanne Fray Australia 15 492 141 121 96 87 32 729
Teniell L. Trolian United States 15 482 1.0× 89 0.6× 166 1.4× 96 1.0× 55 0.6× 53 724
Maithreyi Gopalan United States 8 366 0.7× 135 1.0× 185 1.5× 181 1.9× 97 1.1× 20 757
Paula Wilcox United Kingdom 9 453 0.9× 212 1.5× 144 1.2× 176 1.8× 60 0.7× 15 838
Ben Dalton United States 12 450 0.9× 247 1.8× 83 0.7× 55 0.6× 115 1.3× 31 732
Paul Stephens Norway 15 506 1.0× 113 0.8× 183 1.5× 131 1.4× 64 0.7× 29 822
Christopher Redding United States 15 924 1.9× 246 1.7× 129 1.1× 80 0.8× 143 1.6× 43 1.2k
Stephen Provasnik United States 14 649 1.3× 133 0.9× 89 0.7× 70 0.7× 118 1.4× 23 841
Alison Gilmore New Zealand 12 399 0.8× 94 0.7× 147 1.2× 83 0.9× 29 0.3× 26 594
Nithi Muthukrishna South Africa 14 434 0.9× 139 1.0× 72 0.6× 97 1.0× 149 1.7× 60 758
Kylie Hillman Australia 16 598 1.2× 144 1.0× 61 0.5× 45 0.5× 54 0.6× 55 839

Countries citing papers authored by Leanne Fray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leanne Fray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leanne Fray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leanne Fray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leanne Fray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leanne Fray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leanne Fray. The network helps show where Leanne Fray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leanne Fray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leanne Fray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leanne Fray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leanne Fray. Leanne Fray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2025). Problematising the ‘job-ready graduate’ ideal in Australian higher education: new forms of exclusion in the academy. The Australian Educational Researcher. 52(5). 3221–3238.
2.
Miller, Andrew, Leanne Fray, & Jennifer Gore. (2023). Was COVID-19 an unexpected catalyst for more equitable learning outcomes? A comparative analysis after two years of disrupted schooling in Australian primary schools. The Australian Educational Researcher. 51(2). 587–608. 6 indexed citations
3.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2022). Towards quality teaching in higher education: pedagogy-focused academic development for enhancing practice. The International Journal for Academic Development. 30(4). 553–568. 14 indexed citations
4.
Fray, Leanne, et al.. (2022). Under pressure and overlooked: the impact of COVID-19 on teachers in NSW public schools. The Australian Educational Researcher. 50(3). 701–727. 34 indexed citations
5.
Fray, Leanne, et al.. (2022). Schooling upheaval during COVID-19: troubling consequences for students’ return to school. The Australian Educational Researcher. 50(5). 1533–1550. 11 indexed citations
6.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2022). From performative to professional accountability: re-imagining ‘the field of judgment’ through teacher professional development. Journal of Education Policy. 38(3). 452–473. 26 indexed citations
7.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on student learning in New South Wales primary schools: an empirical study. The Australian Educational Researcher. 48(4). 605–637. 113 indexed citations
8.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2021). Aspiring to higher education in regional and remote Australia: the diverse emotional and material realities shaping young people’s futures. The Australian Educational Researcher. 49(5). 1105–1124. 16 indexed citations
9.
Gore, Jennifer, Andrew Miller, Leanne Fray, Jessica Harris, & Elena Prieto. (2021). Improving student achievement through professional development: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds. Teaching and Teacher Education. 101. 103297–103297. 46 indexed citations
10.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2020). Degrees of “being first”: toward a nuanced understanding of first-generation entrants to higher education. Educational Review. 74(6). 1137–1156. 12 indexed citations
11.
12.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2019). The untold story of middle-class Indigenous Australian school students who aspire to university. Critical Studies in Education. 63(1). 80–95. 5 indexed citations
13.
Eather, Narelle, Leanne Fray, & Jennifer Gore. (2019). Who wants to be a sportsperson? Student aspirations for sporting careers. Sport Education and Society. 25(9). 1072–1085. 4 indexed citations
14.
Lloyd, Adam, Jennifer Gore, Kathryn Holmes, Max Smith, & Leanne Fray. (2018). Parental Influences on Those Seeking a Career in STEM: The Primacy of Gender. Figshare. 10(2). 308–328. 34 indexed citations
15.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2018). Profiling Australian school students’ interest in a nursing career: insights for ensuring the future workforce. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 35(2). 4 indexed citations
16.
Fray, Leanne & Jennifer Gore. (2018). Why people choose teaching: A scoping review of empirical studies, 2007–2016. Teaching and Teacher Education. 75. 153–163. 123 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2018). The burden of expectation in widening participation. Medical Education. 52(9). 889–890. 1 indexed citations
18.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2017). Choosing VET: Investigating the VET Aspirations of School Students. NCVER Research Report.. National Centre for Vocational Education Research. 3 indexed citations
19.
Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2016). Australian School Student Aspirations for Military Careers. Armed Forces & Society. 43(2). 238–259. 5 indexed citations
20.
Bryson, Lois, et al.. (2007). Managing the work–life roller-coaster: Private stress or public health issue?. Social Science & Medicine. 65(6). 1142–1153. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026