Léa Nash
Impact in
-
- Language Development and Disorders
- Reading and Literacy Development
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Papers in
-
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 4
-
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 1
- Co-authors
- Célia Jakubowicz (2 shared papers)Christopher J. Oldfield (1 shared paper)Sylvia A. Denome (1 shared paper)Christophe‐Loïc Gérard (1 shared paper)Alain Rouveret (1 shared paper)Stephen Whiting (1 shared paper)Karim Abu‐Omar (1 shared paper)Ivo Rakovac (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Natural Language & Linguistic Theory (3 papers)Brain and Language (1 paper)Health Policy (1 paper)Language Acquisition (1 paper)Journal of Bacteriology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Léa Nash
10 papers receiving 448 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 193
- Language and Linguistics 102
- Linguistics and Language 28
- Pollution 67
- Cognitive Neuroscience 105
Countries citing papers authored by Léa Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Léa Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Léa Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Léa Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Léa Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Léa Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Léa Nash. The network helps show where Léa Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Léa Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 210 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 153 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 61 | |
| 4 | The Internal Ergative Subject Hypothesis | 1996 | 23 |
| 5 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1981 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 9 | High and Higher Applicatives: The Case of French Non-core Datives * | 2011 | 2 |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 0 |
About Léa Nash
Léa Nash is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (193 citations), Language and Linguistics (102 citations), Linguistics and Language (28 citations), Pollution (67 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations). Léa Nash has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Célia Jakubowicz, Christopher J. Oldfield, Sylvia A. Denome, Christophe‐Loïc Gérard, Alain Rouveret, Stephen Whiting, Karim Abu‐Omar, Ivo Rakovac, Romeu Mendes and João Breda. Their work appears in journals such as Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Brain and Language, Health Policy, Language Acquisition and Journal of Bacteriology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.