Lawrence M. Hanks

7.5k citations
182 papers · 6.0k indexed · h-index 47
Topics
Forest Insect Ecology and Management (137 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (62 papers)Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (60 papers)
Partner nations
United StatesBrazilChina

In The Last Decade

Lawrence M. Hanks

176 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers

Lawrence M. Hanks
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Insect Science 4.8k
  • Ecology 4.1k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.3k
  • Plant Science 931
  • Genetics 880
Replace Therese M. Poland with:
Therese M. Poland United States
Steven J. Seybold United States
Victor C. Mastro United States
Fredrik Schlyter Sweden
John C. Moser United States
Timothy D. Paine United States
Brett P. Hurley South Africa
Jennifer S. Thaler United States
Natsumi Kanzaki Japan
Nancy E. Stamp United States
Lawrence M. Hanks relative to Therese M. Poland United States Therese M. Poland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Therese M. Poland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lawrence M. Hanks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrence M. Hanks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrence M. Hanks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence M. Hanks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lawrence M. Hanks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrence M. Hanks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrence M. Hanks. The network helps show where Lawrence M. Hanks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lawrence M. Hanks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lawrence M. Hanks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lawrence M. Hanks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lawrence M. Hanks. Lawrence M. Hanks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 2
4 1
5 1
6 2
7 5
8 7
9 5
10 23
11 11
12 12
13 14
14 129
15 28
16 6
17 59
18
Sex pheromone of yellow scale, Aonidiella citrina (Homoptera: Diaspididae): Evaluation as an IPM tactic
3
19 23
20 71

About Lawrence M. Hanks

Lawrence M. Hanks is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 182 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (137 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (62 papers) and Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (60 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (4.8k citations), Ecology (4.1k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.3k citations). Lawrence M. Hanks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and China. Frequent co-authors include Jocelyn G. Millar, Timothy D. Paine, Matthew D. Ginzel, John F. Tooker, Robert F. Mitchell, Emerson S. Lacey, Peter F. Reagel, Ann M. Ray, Robert F. Denno and James D. Barbour. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026