John F. Tooker

9.7k total citations · 5 hit papers
158 papers, 6.8k citations indexed

About

John F. Tooker is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John F. Tooker has authored 158 papers receiving a total of 6.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 114 papers in Insect Science, 84 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 58 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in John F. Tooker's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (82 papers), Plant and animal studies (68 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (50 papers). John F. Tooker is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (82 papers), Plant and animal studies (68 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (50 papers). John F. Tooker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Canada. John F. Tooker's co-authors include Margaret R. Douglas, Christina M. Grozinger, Consuelo Μ. De Moraes, Anthony D. Vaudo, Lawrence M. Hanks, Harland M. Patch, Gary W. Felton, Michelle Peiffer, David A. Mortensen and Dawn S. Luthe and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

John F. Tooker

150 papers receiving 6.6k citations

Hit Papers

A framework for evaluatin... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 2015 2015 2013 2016 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John F. Tooker United States 45 4.2k 3.2k 2.9k 1.2k 900 158 6.8k
Jonathan G. Lundgren United States 42 3.7k 0.9× 1.8k 0.6× 2.4k 0.8× 733 0.6× 1.4k 1.6× 134 5.6k
Deborah K. Letourneau United States 31 2.2k 0.5× 2.2k 0.7× 2.3k 0.8× 613 0.5× 302 0.3× 65 4.8k
Jane C. Stout Ireland 44 3.1k 0.7× 4.8k 1.5× 2.5k 0.9× 1.9k 1.5× 311 0.3× 134 6.5k
Alan C. Gange United Kingdom 53 2.1k 0.5× 3.1k 1.0× 5.2k 1.8× 291 0.2× 589 0.7× 169 8.2k
A. C. Newton United Kingdom 51 801 0.2× 1.8k 0.6× 6.4k 2.2× 1.2k 1.0× 1.5k 1.6× 224 9.5k
Roy Sanderson United Kingdom 27 1.0k 0.2× 1.5k 0.5× 1.0k 0.3× 816 0.7× 196 0.2× 78 3.4k
Tesfaye Wubet Germany 44 2.0k 0.5× 1.4k 0.4× 3.6k 1.2× 219 0.2× 1.1k 1.2× 124 7.0k
Sabrina Gaba France 31 722 0.2× 1.3k 0.4× 1.6k 0.6× 599 0.5× 159 0.2× 95 3.5k
Hirokazu Toju Japan 33 927 0.2× 1.1k 0.4× 2.5k 0.9× 363 0.3× 875 1.0× 65 4.3k
Pierre Mineau Canada 36 2.3k 0.5× 1.3k 0.4× 1.0k 0.4× 829 0.7× 225 0.3× 110 5.9k

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Tooker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Tooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Tooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Tooker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Tooker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Tooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Tooker. The network helps show where John F. Tooker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Tooker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Tooker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Tooker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Tooker. John F. Tooker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rowen, Elizabeth, et al.. (2025). Insecticides may facilitate the escape of weeds from biological control. PeerJ. 13. e18597–e18597.
3.
Kammerer, Melanie, Aaron L. Iverson, Kevin Li, John F. Tooker, & Christina M. Grozinger. (2024). Seasonal bee communities vary in their responses to resources at local and landscape scales: implication for land managers. Landscape Ecology. 39(5). 5 indexed citations
4.
Tooker, John F., et al.. (2024). Cryptic or underworked? Taxonomic revision of the Antistrophus rufus species complex (Cynipoidea, Aulacideini). Journal of Hymenoptera Research. 97. 399–439. 5 indexed citations
5.
Tooker, John F., et al.. (2024). Catalog of Endophytic Insects Associated with Rosinweeds (Silphium L., Heliantheae, Asteraceae) in North America. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2024(1).
6.
Yip, Eric C., Mark C. Mescher, Consuelo Μ. De Moraes, & John F. Tooker. (2024). An insect pheromone primes tolerance of herbivory in goldenrod plants. Ecology. 106(1). e4486–e4486. 2 indexed citations
7.
Tooker, John F., et al.. (2023). Comparative anatomy of venom glands suggests a role of maternal secretions in gall induction by cynipid wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Insect Systematics and Diversity. 7(5). 4 indexed citations
8.
Kisiała, Anna, Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate, Donald G. Miller, et al.. (2023). Abscisic Acid: A Potential Secreted Effector Synthesized by Phytophagous Insects for Host-Plant Manipulation. Insects. 14(6). 489–489. 5 indexed citations
9.
Tooker, John F., et al.. (2023). Extreme acidity in a cynipid gall: a potential new defensive strategy against natural enemies. Biology Letters. 19(3). 20220513–20220513. 6 indexed citations
10.
Lower, Sarah E., et al.. (2021). Toxicity of clothianidin to common Eastern North American fireflies. PeerJ. 9. e12495–e12495. 7 indexed citations
11.
Yip, Eric C., Consuelo Μ. De Moraes, John F. Tooker, & Mark C. Mescher. (2020). Sensory co‐evolution: The sex attractant of a gall‐making fly primes plant defences, but female flies recognize resulting changes in host‐plant quality. Journal of Ecology. 109(1). 99–108. 5 indexed citations
12.
Fairfield, Kathleen M., Peter Bates, Erin Graydon-Baker, et al.. (2020). Development of a Certificate in Healthcare Improvement for Inter-Professional Teams. 2(2).
13.
Fleischer, Shelby J., et al.. (2020). Parasitoids, Nematodes, and Protists in Populations of Striped Cucumber Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environmental Entomology. 49(6). 1316–1326. 5 indexed citations
14.
Walter, Jonathan A., Lawrence W. Sheppard, P. Dilip Venugopal, et al.. (2019). Weather and regional crop composition variation drive spatial synchrony of lepidopteran agricultural pests. Ecological Entomology. 45(3). 573–582. 17 indexed citations
15.
Douglas, Margaret R. & John F. Tooker. (2016). Meta-analysis reveals that seed-applied neonicotinoids and pyrethroids have similar negative effects on abundance of arthropod natural enemies. PeerJ. 4. e2776–e2776. 87 indexed citations
16.
17.
Chung, Seung Ho, Cristina Rosa, Erin D. Scully, et al.. (2013). Herbivore exploits orally secreted bacteria to suppress plant defenses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110(39). 15728–15733. 333 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Dong, Jie, Frédéric Francis, Yingjie Liu, et al.. (2012). E-β-farnesene synergizes the influence of an insecticide to improve control of cabbage aphids in China. Crop Protection. 35. 91–96. 22 indexed citations
19.
Frost, Christopher J., J. Dean, Mark C. Mescher, et al.. (2012). A petiole-galling insect herbivore decelerates leaf lamina litter decomposition rates. Functional Ecology. 26(3). 628–636. 15 indexed citations
20.
Tooker, John F. & Lawrence M. Hanks. (2000). Influence of Plant Community Structure on Natural Enemies of Pine Needle Scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in Urban Landscapes. Environmental Entomology. 29(6). 1305–1311. 71 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026