Robert F. Mitchell
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Ecology top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Lawrence M. HanksJocelyn G. MillarPeter F. ReagelMatthew L. RichardsonJoseph WongMartin N. AnderssonElizabeth E. GrahamJudith A. Mongold-Diers
- Topics
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management (25 papers)Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (10 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesAnnual Review of Entomology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Robert F. Mitchell
39 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Insect Science 992
- Ecology 799
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 332
- Genetics 328
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 302
Countries citing papers authored by Robert F. Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert F. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert F. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert F. Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert F. Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert F. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert F. Mitchell. The network helps show where Robert F. Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert F. Mitchell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert F. Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert F. Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert F. Mitchell. Robert F. Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 71 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 66 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 103 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 179 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Robert F. Mitchell
Robert F. Mitchell is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Cell Biology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (25 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (10 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (992 citations), Ecology (799 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (332 citations). Robert F. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence M. Hanks, Jocelyn G. Millar, Peter F. Reagel, Matthew L. Richardson, Joseph Wong, Martin N. Andersson, Elizabeth E. Graham, Judith A. Mongold-Diers, Linnea R. Meier and James D. Barbour. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Annual Review of Entomology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.