Ann M. Ray

1.4k total citations
36 papers, 826 citations indexed

About

Ann M. Ray is a scholar working on Ecology, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann M. Ray has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 826 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Ecology, 28 papers in Insect Science and 10 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Ann M. Ray's work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (34 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (16 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (10 papers). Ann M. Ray is often cited by papers focused on Forest Insect Ecology and Management (34 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (16 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (10 papers). Ann M. Ray collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ireland. Ann M. Ray's co-authors include Lawrence M. Hanks, Jocelyn G. Millar, Emerson S. Lacey, J. Steven McElfresh, James D. Barbour, Jardel A. Moreira, Matthew D. Ginzel, Hannah Nadel, Scott W. Myers and Steven W. Lingafelter and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Journal of Chemical Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Ann M. Ray

36 papers receiving 798 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ann M. Ray United States 16 682 663 251 139 101 36 826
Midori Fukaya Japan 20 616 0.9× 697 1.1× 228 0.9× 52 0.4× 153 1.5× 46 885
Jérôme Niogret United States 18 532 0.8× 649 1.0× 134 0.5× 74 0.5× 78 0.8× 42 868
Alex Protasov Israel 14 256 0.4× 389 0.6× 219 0.9× 82 0.6× 41 0.4× 32 518
W. D. Morewood Canada 13 302 0.4× 379 0.6× 123 0.5× 52 0.4× 52 0.5× 21 475
A. Protasov Israel 11 353 0.5× 392 0.6× 217 0.9× 137 1.0× 33 0.3× 19 583
Zvi Mendel Israel 21 780 1.1× 850 1.3× 260 1.0× 247 1.8× 106 1.0× 55 1.2k
Stanley J. Barras United States 14 543 0.8× 504 0.8× 140 0.6× 91 0.7× 98 1.0× 24 649
Nami Uechi Japan 14 244 0.4× 389 0.6× 488 1.9× 25 0.2× 127 1.3× 54 596
C. C. Hanlon United States 13 193 0.3× 264 0.4× 184 0.7× 25 0.2× 61 0.6× 15 392
Stephanie A. Dole United States 9 560 0.8× 521 0.8× 40 0.2× 61 0.4× 145 1.4× 11 589

Countries citing papers authored by Ann M. Ray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann M. Ray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann M. Ray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann M. Ray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann M. Ray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann M. Ray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann M. Ray. The network helps show where Ann M. Ray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann M. Ray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann M. Ray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann M. Ray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann M. Ray. Ann M. Ray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Santoiemma, Giacomo, Andrea Battisti, Claudine Courtin, et al.. (2024). Testing a trapping protocol for generic surveillance of wood-boring beetles in heterogeneous landscapes. NeoBiota. 95. 77–95. 4 indexed citations
3.
4.
Rice, Marlin E., Lawrence M. Hanks, Judith A. Mongold-Diers, et al.. (2022). Methionol, a Sulfur-Containing Pheromone Component from the North American Cerambycid Beetle Knulliana cincta cincta. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 48(4). 347–358. 2 indexed citations
5.
Álvarez‐López, Vanessa, et al.. (2020). Protein self‐marking by emerald ash borer: an evaluation of efficacy and persistence. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 168(9). 678–687. 1 indexed citations
6.
Wu, Yunke, John J. Molongoski, Peter F. Reagel, et al.. (2017). Identification of wood-boring beetles (Cerambycidae and Buprestidae) intercepted in trade-associated solid wood packaging material using DNA barcoding and morphology. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 40316–40316. 75 indexed citations
7.
Álvarez‐López, Vanessa, Mark S. Hoddle, Joseph A. Francese, D. R. Lance, & Ann M. Ray. (2017). Assessing Flight Potential of the Invasive Asian Longhorned Beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) With Computerized Flight Mills. Journal of Economic Entomology. 110(3). 1070–1077. 23 indexed citations
8.
Álvarez‐López, Vanessa, et al.. (2016). The History of Attack and Success of Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) on White Fringetree in Southwestern Ohio. Environmental Entomology. 45(4). 961–966. 14 indexed citations
9.
Zou, Yunfan, Jocelyn G. Millar, J. Scott Blackwood, et al.. (2015). (2S,4E)-2-Hydroxy-4-octen-3-one, a Male-Produced Attractant Pheromone of the Cerambycid Beetle Tylonotus bimaculatus. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 41(7). 670–677. 13 indexed citations
10.
Ray, Ann M., James D. Barbour, J. Steven McElfresh, et al.. (2012). 2,3-Hexanediols as Sex Attractants and a Female-produced Sex Pheromone for Cerambycid Beetles in the Prionine Genus Tragosoma. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 38(9). 1151–1158. 32 indexed citations
11.
Ray, Ann M., et al.. (2012). (R)-Desmolactone, A Female-produced Sex Pheromone Component of the Cerambycid Beetle Desmocerus californicus californicus (subfamily Lepturinae). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 38(2). 157–167. 17 indexed citations
12.
Ray, Ann M., et al.. (2011). cis-Vaccenyl Acetate, A Female-Produced Sex Pheromone Component of Ortholeptura valida, A Longhorned Beetle in the Subfamily Lepturinae. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 37(2). 173–178. 31 indexed citations
13.
Millar, Jocelyn G., et al.. (2010). Determination of the Relative and Absolute Configurations of the Female-produced Sex Pheromone of the Cerambycid Beetle Prionus californicus. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 37(1). 114–124. 37 indexed citations
14.
Ray, Ann M., Matthew D. Ginzel, & Lawrence M. Hanks. (2009). MaleMegacyllene robiniae(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Use Multiple Tactics When Aggressively Competing for Mates. Environmental Entomology. 38(2). 425–432. 6 indexed citations
15.
McElfresh, J. Steven, et al.. (2009). Identification and Synthesis of a Female-Produced Sex Pheromone for the Cerambycid Beetle Prionus Californicus. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 35(5). 590–600. 47 indexed citations
16.
Ray, Ann M., et al.. (2009). Male-Produced Aggregation Pheromone of the Cerambycid Beetle Rosalia funebris. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 35(1). 96–103. 53 indexed citations
17.
Hanks, Lawrence M., Jocelyn G. Millar, Jardel A. Moreira, et al.. (2007). Using Generic Pheromone Lures to Expedite Identification of Aggregation Pheromones for the Cerambycid Beetles Xylotrechus nauticus, Phymatodes lecontei, and Neoclytus modestus modestus. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 33(5). 889–907. 85 indexed citations
18.
Lacey, Emerson S., Ann M. Ray, & Lawrence M. Hanks. (2007). Calling Behavior of the Cerambycid Beetle Neoclytus acuminatus acuminatus (F.). Journal of Insect Behavior. 20(1). 117–128. 24 indexed citations
19.
Ray, Ann M., Emerson S. Lacey, & Lawrence M. Hanks. (2006). Predicted taxonomic patterns in pheromone production by longhorned beetles. Die Naturwissenschaften. 93(11). 543–550. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026