Fredrik Schlyter

6.7k total citations
120 papers, 5.0k citations indexed

About

Fredrik Schlyter is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Fredrik Schlyter has authored 120 papers receiving a total of 5.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 104 papers in Insect Science, 93 papers in Ecology and 25 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Fredrik Schlyter's work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (91 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (78 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (43 papers). Fredrik Schlyter is often cited by papers focused on Forest Insect Ecology and Management (91 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (78 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (43 papers). Fredrik Schlyter collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Czechia and Germany. Fredrik Schlyter's co-authors include Qing‐He Zhang, Göran Birgersson, John A. Byers, Jan L�fqvist, Olle Anderbrant, G�ran Birgersson, Peter Anderson, Gunnar Bergstr�m, Martin N. Andersson and Bill S. Hansson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Fredrik Schlyter

120 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fredrik Schlyter Sweden 42 4.1k 3.3k 1.0k 934 790 120 5.0k
Lawrence M. Hanks United States 47 4.8k 1.2× 4.1k 1.3× 2.3k 2.2× 880 0.9× 931 1.2× 182 6.0k
Steven J. Seybold United States 37 3.5k 0.9× 3.5k 1.1× 747 0.7× 696 0.7× 554 0.7× 129 4.9k
D. M. Suckling New Zealand 38 5.5k 1.3× 1.7k 0.5× 2.2k 2.1× 1.1k 1.1× 1.7k 2.2× 316 6.7k
Göran Birgersson Sweden 33 1.9k 0.5× 1.4k 0.4× 726 0.7× 413 0.4× 626 0.8× 87 2.8k
Victor C. Mastro United States 32 2.6k 0.6× 2.5k 0.8× 734 0.7× 448 0.5× 451 0.6× 99 3.3k
John C. Moser United States 35 2.4k 0.6× 1.7k 0.5× 1.7k 1.6× 817 0.9× 360 0.5× 139 3.4k
Olle Anderbrant Sweden 29 1.9k 0.5× 1.1k 0.3× 682 0.7× 518 0.6× 528 0.7× 122 2.4k
Denis Thiéry France 38 3.5k 0.9× 928 0.3× 2.2k 2.1× 1.2k 1.3× 1.6k 2.0× 160 4.8k
Stephen W. McKechnie Australia 35 1.3k 0.3× 1.3k 0.4× 972 0.9× 1.2k 1.3× 500 0.6× 80 4.0k
Thomas W. Sappington United States 35 3.1k 0.8× 706 0.2× 779 0.7× 1.3k 1.4× 1.4k 1.7× 171 4.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Fredrik Schlyter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fredrik Schlyter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fredrik Schlyter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fredrik Schlyter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fredrik Schlyter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fredrik Schlyter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fredrik Schlyter. The network helps show where Fredrik Schlyter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fredrik Schlyter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fredrik Schlyter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fredrik Schlyter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fredrik Schlyter. Fredrik Schlyter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Martel, Véronique, Fredrik Schlyter, Medhat M. Sadek, et al.. (2024). Host‐dependent larval migration and parasitism risk in a polyphagous moth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 172(6). 523–532. 1 indexed citations
2.
Schlyter, Fredrik, et al.. (2023). Predator odor can reduce acorn removal by granivorous rodents in mixed oak forest stands. Forest Ecology and Management. 548. 121411–121411. 4 indexed citations
3.
4.
Andersson, Martin N., Carsten Kirkeby, Daniel Powell, et al.. (2022). Weak population genetic structure in Eurasian spruce bark beetle over large regional scales in Sweden. Ecology and Evolution. 12(7). e9078–e9078. 8 indexed citations
5.
Powell, Daniel, Ewald Große‐Wilde, Paal Krokene, et al.. (2021). A highly-contiguous genome assembly of the Eurasian spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus, provides insight into a major forest pest. Communications Biology. 4(1). 1059–1059. 33 indexed citations
6.
Chakraborty, Amrita, et al.. (2020). Unravelling the gut bacteriome of Ips (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): identifying core bacterial assemblage and their ecological relevance. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 18572–18572. 39 indexed citations
7.
8.
Birgersson, Göran, et al.. (2019). Using synthetic semiochemicals to train canines to detect bark beetle–infested trees. Annals of Forest Science. 76(2). 17 indexed citations
9.
Schlyter, Fredrik, Rastislav Jakuš, Blanka Kalinová, et al.. (2015). Reproductive Isolation of Ips nitidus and I. shangrila in Mountain Forests of Western China: Responses to Chiral and Achiral Candidate Pheromone Components. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 41(7). 678–688. 7 indexed citations
10.
Unelius, C. Rikard, et al.. (2014). Non-Host Volatile Blend Optimization for Forest Protection against the European Spruce Bark Beetle, Ips typographus. PLoS ONE. 9(1). e85381–e85381. 38 indexed citations
11.
Hegazi, E. M., W. E. Khafagi, & Fredrik Schlyter. (2013). Egg maturation dynamics of the parasitoid Microplitis rufiventris : starvation speeds maturation in early life. Physiological Entomology. 38(3). 233–240. 10 indexed citations
12.
Schlyter, Fredrik. (2012). Semiochemical Diversity in Practice: Antiattractant Semiochemicals Reduce Bark Beetle Attacks on Standing Trees—A First Meta-Analysis. Psyche A Journal of Entomology. 2012. 1–10. 20 indexed citations
13.
Jactel, Hervé, Göran Birgersson, Stefan Andersson, & Fredrik Schlyter. (2011). Non-host volatiles mediate associational resistance to the pine processionary moth. Oecologia. 166(3). 703–711. 123 indexed citations
14.
Andersson, Martin N., Muhammad Binyameen, Medhat M. Sadek, & Fredrik Schlyter. (2011). Attraction Modulated by Spacing of Pheromone Components and Anti-attractants in a Bark Beetle and a Moth. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 37(8). 899–911. 33 indexed citations
15.
Zhang, Qing‐He, et al.. (2007). Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Ips duplicatus to Aggregation Pheromone in Inner Mongolia, China: Amitinol as a Potential Pheromone Component. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 33(7). 1303–1315. 18 indexed citations
16.
Zhang, Qing‐He, Fredrik Schlyter, & Peter Anderson. (1999). Green Leaf Volatiles Interrupt Pheromone Response of Spruce Bark Beetle, Ips typographus. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 25(12). 2847–2861. 88 indexed citations
17.
18.
Schlyter, Fredrik & Olle Anderbrant. (1993). Competition and Niche Separation between Two Bark Beetles: Existence and Mechanisms. Oikos. 68(3). 437–437. 65 indexed citations
19.
Anderbrant, Olle & Fredrik Schlyter. (1987). Differences in morphology and sexual size dimorphism between the Dutch elm disease vectors Scolytus laevis and Scolytus scolytus (Col., Scolytidae). Journal of Applied Entomology. 103(1-5). 378–386. 3 indexed citations
20.
Byers, John A., Boel Lanne, Jan L�fqvist, Fredrik Schlyter, & Gunnar Bergstr�m. (1985). Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles. Die Naturwissenschaften. 72(6). 324–326. 139 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lawrence M. Hanks Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Steven J. Seybold Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. M. Suckling Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Göran Birgersson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Victor C. Mastro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John C. Moser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Olle Anderbrant Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Denis Thiéry Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen W. McKechnie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas W. Sappington
Rankless by CCL
2026