Lawrence Ein

3.9k citations
51 papers · 1.6k indexed · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Lawrence Ein

49 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Lawrence Ein
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Geometry and Topology 1.5k
  • Algebra and Number Theory 588
  • Computational Mathematics 46
  • Mathematical Physics 650
  • Applied Mathematics 332
Replace Mircea Mustaţă with:
Mircea Mustaţă United States
Christian Okonek Germany
Fabrizio Catanese Germany
Frank–Olaf Schreyer Germany
Jean-Louis Colliot-Thélène France
Eckart Viehweg Germany
Alexei N. Skorobogatov United Kingdom
Seán Keel United States
Fedor Bogomolov United States
Dan Laksov Sweden
Lawrence Ein relative to Mircea Mustaţă United States Mircea Mustaţă's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Mircea Mustaţă · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lawrence Ein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrence Ein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrence Ein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence Ein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lawrence Ein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrence Ein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrence Ein. The network helps show where Lawrence Ein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Lawrence Ein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lawrence Ein Line = papers co-authored together Lawrence Ein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006105
2 199799
3 200097
4 199382
5 199379
6 200979
7 199175
8 198660
9 198958
10 199557
11 198856
12 200452
13 200351
14 200340
15 200439
16 200437
17 200337
18 198637
19 199933
20 199131

About Lawrence Ein

Lawrence Ein is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (45 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (20 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (17 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (16 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (7 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (6 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (5 papers) and Meromorphic and Entire Functions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (1.5k citations), Algebra and Number Theory (588 citations), Computational Mathematics (46 citations), Mathematical Physics (650 citations) and Applied Mathematics (332 citations). Lawrence Ein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Robert Lazarsfeld, Mircea Mustaţă, Tommaso de Fernex, Mihnea Popa, Michael Nakamaye, Aaron Bertram, Jean-Pierre Demailly, Karen E. Smith, N. I. Shepherd‐Barron and Dror Varolin. Their work appears in journals such as Inventiones mathematicae, Mathematische Annalen, Duke Mathematical Journal, American Journal of Mathematics and Journal of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact