N. I. Shepherd‐Barron
- Geometry and Topology top 1%
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 10%
- Applied Mathematics top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lawrence EinRichard TaylorA. Van de VenA. J. de JongYoichi MiyaokaTorsten EkedahlBjorn PoonenEric M. Rains
- Topics
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (17 papers)Advanced Algebra and Geometry (12 papers)Advanced Topics in Algebra (3 papers)
- Journals
- Inventiones mathematicaeBulletin of the London Mathematical SocietyAmerican Journal of Mathematics
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSouth Sudan
In The Last Decade
N. I. Shepherd‐Barron
23 papers receiving 427 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Geometry and Topology 500
- Mathematical Physics 273
- Algebra and Number Theory 109
- Applied Mathematics 72
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 71
Countries citing papers authored by N. I. Shepherd‐Barron
This map shows the geographic impact of N. I. Shepherd‐Barron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. I. Shepherd‐Barron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. I. Shepherd‐Barron more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. I. Shepherd‐Barron
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. I. Shepherd‐Barron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. I. Shepherd‐Barron. The network helps show where N. I. Shepherd‐Barron may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. I. Shepherd‐Barron
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. I. Shepherd‐Barron. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. I. Shepherd‐Barron based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. I. Shepherd‐Barron. N. I. Shepherd‐Barron is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | The absence of stable Schottky forms | 4 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | Invariant theory for $S_5$ and the rationality of $M_6$ | 14 |
| 17 | The rationality of some moduli spaces of plane curves | 12 |
| 18 | 207 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About N. I. Shepherd‐Barron
N. I. Shepherd‐Barron is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (17 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (12 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (500 citations), Mathematical Physics (273 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (109 citations). N. I. Shepherd‐Barron has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence Ein, Richard Taylor, A. Van de Ven, A. J. de Jong, Yoichi Miyaoka, Torsten Ekedahl, Bjorn Poonen, Eric M. Rains, John Tate and I. Grojnowski. Their work appears in journals such as Inventiones mathematicae, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society and American Journal of Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.