Laurie McLeod

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
12 papers, 694 citations indexed

About

Laurie McLeod is a scholar working on Information Systems, Management Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Laurie McLeod has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 694 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Information Systems, 5 papers in Management Information Systems and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Laurie McLeod's work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (6 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (4 papers). Laurie McLeod is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (6 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (4 papers). Laurie McLeod collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Greece. Laurie McLeod's co-authors include Bill Doolin, Stephen G. MacDonell, Felix B. Tan, Rachelle Bosua, Stephen Teo, Tim Bentley, Marianne Gloet and Nathalie Mitev and has published in prestigious journals such as ACM Computing Surveys, European Journal of Information Systems and Applied Ergonomics.

In The Last Decade

Laurie McLeod

12 papers receiving 643 citations

Hit Papers

The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbein... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300

Peers

Laurie McLeod
Keri Pearlson United States
Dana L. Farrow United States
Jens Mattke Germany
Anastasia Sergeeva Netherlands
Neil McBride United Kingdom
Jon Turner United States
Vikram Sethi United States
Gábor Kismihók Netherlands
Simon Trang Germany
Keri Pearlson United States
Laurie McLeod
Citations per year, relative to Laurie McLeod Laurie McLeod (= 1×) peers Keri Pearlson

Countries citing papers authored by Laurie McLeod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurie McLeod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurie McLeod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurie McLeod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurie McLeod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurie McLeod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurie McLeod. The network helps show where Laurie McLeod may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurie McLeod

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurie McLeod. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurie McLeod based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurie McLeod. Laurie McLeod is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Bentley, Tim, Stephen Teo, Laurie McLeod, et al.. (2015). The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics. 52. 207–215. 359 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Doolin, Bill, et al.. (2014). Information Systems and Global Assemblages. (Re)Configuring Actors, Artefacts, Organizations. IFIP advances in information and communication technology. 2 indexed citations
3.
Doolin, Bill & Laurie McLeod. (2012). Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development. European Journal of Information Systems. 21(5). 570–586. 92 indexed citations
4.
McLeod, Laurie, Stephen G. MacDonell, & Bill Doolin. (2011). IS development practice in New Zealand organisations. Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology). 4 indexed citations
5.
McLeod, Laurie & Stephen G. MacDonell. (2011). Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes. ACM Computing Surveys. 43(4). 1–56. 145 indexed citations
6.
McLeod, Laurie & Bill Doolin. (2011). Information systems development as situated socio-technical change: a process approach. European Journal of Information Systems. 21(2). 176–191. 38 indexed citations
7.
McLeod, Laurie & Stephen G. MacDonell. (2010). Stakeholder perceptions of software project outcomes. Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology). 1–4. 3 indexed citations
8.
McLeod, Laurie & Bill Doolin. (2010). Documents As Mediating Artifacts in Contemporary IS Development. 1–10. 7 indexed citations
9.
MacDonell, Stephen G., et al.. (2008). Raising healthy software systems. Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology). 57. 21–24. 1 indexed citations
10.
McLeod, Laurie, Stephen G. MacDonell, & Bill Doolin. (2007). User Participation in Contemporary IS Development: an IS management perspective. AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems. 15(1). 12 indexed citations
11.
McLeod, Laurie, Stephen G. MacDonell, & Bill Doolin. (2007). Standard method use in contemporary IS development: an empirical investigation. Journal of Systems and Information Technology. 9(1). 6–29. 2 indexed citations
12.
Doolin, Bill, et al.. (2003). Internet Strategies for Established Retailers: Four New Zealand Case Studies. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research. 5(4). 3–20. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026