J. A. Burrow
- Classics top 0.1%
- History top 0.5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Penny Schine GoldG. M. SheddStephen Joseph PowellDerek PearsallR. M. WilsonJulia BoffeySiegfried WenzelThorlac Turville‐Petre
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (29 papers)Historical Studies of British Isles (8 papers)Linguistics and language evolution (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
J. A. Burrow
40 papers receiving 190 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Classics 283
- History 209
- Literature and Literary Theory 83
- Sociology and Political Science 44
- Language and Linguistics 41
Countries citing papers authored by J. A. Burrow
This map shows the geographic impact of J. A. Burrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. A. Burrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. A. Burrow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. A. Burrow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. A. Burrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. A. Burrow. The network helps show where J. A. Burrow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. A. Burrow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. A. Burrow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. A. Burrow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. A. Burrow. J. A. Burrow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Medieval alliterative poetry : essays in honour of Thorlac Turville-Petre | 11 |
| 3 | Medieval Writers and Their Work: Middle English Literature 1100-1500. 2d ed | 5 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Thomas Hoccleve: a Facsimile of the Autograph Verse Manuscripts | 7 |
| 6 | A facsimile of the autograph verse manuscripts | 1 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | Thomas Hoccleve's Complaint and Dialogue | 14 |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Thinking in poetry: three Medieval examples | 1 |
| 12 | The Spenser Encyclopaedia | 1 |
| 13 | Middle English literature : British Academy Gollancz lectures | 5 |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About J. A. Burrow
J. A. Burrow is a scholar working on Classics, History and Language and Linguistics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (29 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (8 papers) and Linguistics and language evolution (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (283 citations), History (209 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (83 citations). J. A. Burrow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Penny Schine Gold, G. M. Shedd, Stephen Joseph Powell, Derek Pearsall, R. M. Wilson, Julia Boffey, Siegfried Wenzel, Thorlac Turville‐Petre, Hoyt N. Duggan and Ad Putter. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Modern Language Review and New Literary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.