Lorraine Code
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 11
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 4
- Gender Studies top 5%
-
- Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies 13
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics 7
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 4
- Religion, Ecology, and Ethics 3
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 6
-
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics 3
- Co-authors
- Claudia CardLaurence BonjourJohn HeilKirsti MalterudLucy M. CandibHelen E. LonginoClaudia W. RuitenbergD. C. Phillips
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lorraine Code
53 papers receiving 985 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Philosophy 316
- Gender Studies 172
- Sociology and Political Science 680
- Geography, Planning and Development 65
- Political Science and International Relations 213
Countries citing papers authored by Lorraine Code
This map shows the geographic impact of Lorraine Code's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorraine Code with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorraine Code more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lorraine Code
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorraine Code. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorraine Code. The network helps show where Lorraine Code may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Lorraine Code, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 94 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 8 | What is natural about epistemology naturalized | 1996 | 18 |
| 9 | 1995 | 41 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 12 | What can she know | 1991 | 56 |
| 13 | 1990 | 63 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 18 | Responsibility and the Epistemic Community: Woman's Place | 1983 | 3 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 3 |
About Lorraine Code
Lorraine Code is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies and General Social Sciences, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers) and Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (316 citations), Gender Studies (172 citations), Sociology and Political Science (680 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (65 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (213 citations). Lorraine Code has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claudia Card, Laurence Bonjour, John Heil, Kirsti Malterud, Lucy M. Candib, Helen E. Longino, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, D. C. Phillips, Shulamit Reinharz and Lynn Davidman. Their work appears in journals such as Hypatia, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Monist, Philosophical Papers and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.