Lauralie Richard
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Epidemiology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Jane GunnJohn FurlerRosemary CallanderDonella PiperRick IedemaVictoria PalmerHelen HerrmanGrant Russell
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Psychiatric ResearchBMJ Open
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Lauralie Richard
23 papers receiving 568 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- General Health Professions 369
- Clinical Psychology 98
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 82
- Epidemiology 67
- Sociology and Political Science 60
Countries citing papers authored by Lauralie Richard
This map shows the geographic impact of Lauralie Richard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lauralie Richard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lauralie Richard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lauralie Richard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lauralie Richard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lauralie Richard. The network helps show where Lauralie Richard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lauralie Richard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lauralie Richard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lauralie Richard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lauralie Richard. Lauralie Richard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | Scoping Review Protocol | 1 |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvementbreakdown → | 209 |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 111 | |
| 19 | 64 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Lauralie Richard
Lauralie Richard is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services and Conservation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (369 citations), Emergency Medical Services (36 citations) and Health (41 citations). Lauralie Richard has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jane Gunn, John Furler, Rosemary Callander, Donella Piper, Rick Iedema, Victoria Palmer, Helen Herrman, Grant Russell, Glenn Robert and Lynne Maher. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Psychiatric Research and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.