Hilary Boyd
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Co-authors
- Andrew OldRosemary CallanderLauralie RichardHelen HerrmanDonella PiperJane GunnRick IedemaJohn Furler
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers)Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Hilary Boyd
5 papers receiving 410 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- General Health Professions 277
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 67
- Clinical Psychology 46
- Sociology and Political Science 32
- Human-Computer Interaction 30
Countries citing papers authored by Hilary Boyd
This map shows the geographic impact of Hilary Boyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hilary Boyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hilary Boyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hilary Boyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hilary Boyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hilary Boyd. The network helps show where Hilary Boyd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hilary Boyd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hilary Boyd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hilary Boyd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hilary Boyd. Hilary Boyd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvementbreakdown → | 209 |
| 3 | Improving healthcare through the use of co-design. | 202 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Bovine Medicine, Diseases and Husbandry of Cattle, 2nd Edition | 6 |
| 6 | Nuevas familias: convivir con los hijos de tu pareja | 0 |
About Hilary Boyd
Hilary Boyd is a scholar working on General Social Sciences, General Health Professions and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (277 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (30 citations) and Applied Psychology (20 citations). Hilary Boyd has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Old, Rosemary Callander, Lauralie Richard, Helen Herrman, Donella Piper, Jane Gunn, Rick Iedema, John Furler, Glenn Robert and Victoria Palmer. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Humanities, Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.