Ruth Cunningham

1.3k citations
58 papers · 763 indexed · h-index 15

Ruth Cunningham

51 papers receiving 754 citations

Peers

Ruth Cunningham
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 143
  • Oncology 245
  • Clinical Psychology 162
  • Health 64
  • Pharmacy 30
Replace Hung‐Ru Lin with:
Hung‐Ru Lin Taiwan
Mina Hosseinzadeh Iran
Nora Sporn United States
Caitlin G. Allen United States
Caroline McLeod United States
Christina Karamanidou Greece
Lyndsay D. Hughes United Kingdom
Timiya S. Nolan United States
Letitia Williams United States
Thomas A. D’Agostino United States
Ruth Cunningham relative to Hung‐Ru Lin Taiwan Hung‐Ru Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Hung‐Ru Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Cunningham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Cunningham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Cunningham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Cunningham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Cunningham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Cunningham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Cunningham. The network helps show where Ruth Cunningham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Cunningham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Cunningham Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Cunningham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20242
4 20240
5 20241
6 20240
7 202312
8 20231
9 202114
10 202113
11 20204
12
Is there systemic bias for Māori with eating disorders? A need for greater awareness in the healthcare system.
20206
13 202013
14 202019
15 202012
16 20208
17 201584
18
Premature mortality in adults using New Zealand psychiatric services.
201443
19 201026
20 2010105

About Ruth Cunningham

Ruth Cunningham is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Health, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (13 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (10 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (6 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (143 citations), Oncology (245 citations), Clinical Psychology (162 citations), Health (64 citations) and Pharmacy (30 citations). Ruth Cunningham has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Diana Sarfati, Debbie Peterson, James Stanley, Sunny Collings, Tony Blakely, Cameron Lacey, June Atkinson, Caroline Shaw, Susanna Every‐Palmer and Sarah Hill. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, BJPsych Open, BMC Cancer, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology and Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026