Laura J. Claxton

1.2k total citations
24 papers, 855 citations indexed

About

Laura J. Claxton is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Laura J. Claxton has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 855 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Laura J. Claxton's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (6 papers). Laura J. Claxton is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (6 papers). Laura J. Claxton collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Laura J. Claxton's co-authors include Stephanie M. Carlson, Louis J. Moses, Rachel Keen, Michael E. McCarty, Jeffrey M. Haddad, Shirley Rietdyk, Jessica E. Huber, Joong Hyun Ryu, Richard E.A. van Emmerik and Gary E. Riccio and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Laura J. Claxton

23 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Laura J. Claxton United States 11 489 329 221 145 131 24 855
Kristine M. Jensen de López Denmark 10 544 1.1× 382 1.2× 67 0.3× 148 1.0× 144 1.1× 48 959
Hermundur Sigmundsson Norway 20 823 1.7× 258 0.8× 117 0.5× 220 1.5× 83 0.6× 54 1.2k
Kari S. Kretch United States 12 479 1.0× 278 0.8× 151 0.7× 84 0.6× 85 0.6× 24 843
Rachel Keen United States 19 772 1.6× 510 1.6× 324 1.5× 124 0.9× 32 0.2× 34 1.1k
François Jouen France 16 273 0.6× 332 1.0× 240 1.1× 115 0.8× 27 0.2× 51 854
Melissa W. Clearfield United States 15 740 1.5× 338 1.0× 176 0.8× 132 0.9× 194 1.5× 27 1.3k
Sarah E. Berger United States 17 431 0.9× 219 0.7× 109 0.5× 135 0.9× 75 0.6× 40 739
Stefania Zoia Italy 15 499 1.0× 514 1.6× 240 1.1× 136 0.9× 71 0.5× 25 927
Kathi Kamm United States 5 479 1.0× 399 1.2× 177 0.8× 276 1.9× 52 0.4× 7 933
William M. Murrah United States 11 720 1.5× 130 0.4× 67 0.3× 142 1.0× 97 0.7× 29 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Laura J. Claxton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura J. Claxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura J. Claxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura J. Claxton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura J. Claxton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura J. Claxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura J. Claxton. The network helps show where Laura J. Claxton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura J. Claxton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura J. Claxton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura J. Claxton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura J. Claxton. Laura J. Claxton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Boor, Brandon E., et al.. (2026). A transdisciplinary process-oriented approach to evaluate infant exposure to indoor dust. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.
2.
Ambike, Satyajit, et al.. (2025). Role differentiated bimanual manipulation during a lab-based free play task. Infant Behavior and Development. 78. 102031–102031. 1 indexed citations
3.
Claxton, Laura J., et al.. (2023). Effect of carrying objects on walking characteristics and language abilities in 13- and 24-month-olds.. Developmental Psychology. 59(7). 1218–1235. 1 indexed citations
4.
King, Jennifer, et al.. (2023). Controlling posture to see the world: The integration of visual task demands and postural sway in sitting and standing infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 238. 105804–105804. 1 indexed citations
5.
Claxton, Laura J., et al.. (2020). PPM2 Decision Modelling Approaches for Histology-Independent Cancer Technologies. Value in Health. 23. S687–S687. 1 indexed citations
6.
Murphy, Paul, et al.. (2020). PPM12 DATA Collection and Heterogeneity: Implications for Histology-Independent Decision Making. Value in Health. 23. S689–S689. 1 indexed citations
7.
Claxton, Laura J., et al.. (2019). Task‐specific adaptations of postural sway in sitting infants. Developmental Psychobiology. 62(1). 99–106. 5 indexed citations
8.
Claxton, Laura J., et al.. (2019). A Mathematical Model to Examine Issues Associated With Using Portable Force-Measurement Technologies to Collect Infant Postural Data. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 8(1). 14–37. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ducharme, Scott W., et al.. (2018). Association between stride time fractality and gait adaptability during unperturbed and asymmetric walking. Human Movement Science. 58. 248–259. 23 indexed citations
10.
Claxton, Laura J., et al.. (2017). To Drop or Not to Drop: Newly Standing Infants Maintain Hold of Objects When Experiencing a Loss of Balance. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 5(2). 181–192. 3 indexed citations
11.
Zelaznik, Howard N., Jessica E. Huber, Shirley Rietdyk, et al.. (2016). The efficacy of the Microsoft KinectTM to assess human bimanual coordination. Behavior Research Methods. 49(3). 1030–1047. 9 indexed citations
12.
Claxton, Laura J., et al.. (2014). Sitting infants alter the magnitude and structure of postural sway when performing a manual goal‐directed task. Developmental Psychobiology. 56(6). 1416–1422. 11 indexed citations
13.
Carlson, Stephanie M., Laura J. Claxton, & Louis J. Moses. (2013). The Relation Between Executive Function and Theory of Mind is More Than Skin Deep. Journal of Cognition and Development. 16(1). 186–197. 79 indexed citations
14.
Haddad, Jeffrey M., Shirley Rietdyk, Laura J. Claxton, & Jessica E. Huber. (2013). Task-Dependent Postural Control Throughout the Lifespan. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 41(2). 123–132. 85 indexed citations
15.
Claxton, Laura J., et al.. (2013). Newly Standing Infants Increase Postural Stability When Performing a Supra-Postural Task. PLoS ONE. 8(8). e71288–e71288. 19 indexed citations
16.
Claxton, Laura J., et al.. (2012). The control of posture in newly standing infants is task dependent. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 113(1). 159–165. 24 indexed citations
17.
Haddad, Jeffrey M., Laura J. Claxton, Rachel Keen, et al.. (2011). Development of the coordination between posture and manual control. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 111(2). 286–298. 25 indexed citations
19.
Claxton, Laura J., Michael E. McCarty, & Rachel Keen. (2009). Self-directed action affects planning in tool-use tasks with toddlers. Infant Behavior and Development. 32(2). 230–233. 35 indexed citations
20.
Carlson, Stephanie M., Louis J. Moses, & Laura J. Claxton. (2004). Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 87(4). 299–319. 387 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026