Laura J. Blair
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Physiology top 2%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Neurology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Chad A. DickeyJohn KorenJonathan J. SabbaghJohn C. O’LearyUmesh K. JinwalBryce A. NordhuesJeremy D. BakerAmelia G. Johnson
- Topics
- Heat shock proteins research (31 papers)Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (19 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (16 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryAngewandte Chemie International Edition
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyRussia
In The Last Decade
Laura J. Blair
69 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Molecular Biology 2.0k
- Physiology 1.2k
- Cell Biology 774
- Neurology 475
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 401
Countries citing papers authored by Laura J. Blair
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura J. Blair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura J. Blair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura J. Blair more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura J. Blair
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura J. Blair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura J. Blair. The network helps show where Laura J. Blair may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura J. Blair
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura J. Blair. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura J. Blair based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura J. Blair. Laura J. Blair is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 110 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 54 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 48 | |
| 12 | 54 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 83 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 206 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 67 |
About Laura J. Blair
Laura J. Blair is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Aging and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 70 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heat shock proteins research (31 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (19 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (242 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (293 citations) and Aging (111 citations). Laura J. Blair has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Chad A. Dickey, John Koren, Jonathan J. Sabbagh, John C. O’Leary, Umesh K. Jinwal, Bryce A. Nordhues, Jeremy D. Baker, Amelia G. Johnson, Jose F. Abisambra and April L. Darling. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.