Laura de Ruiter
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 1%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Marina Umaschi BersEmily RelkinFriederike EysselDieta KuchenbrandtFrank HegelEva PajkrtBen W. MolN. Kok
- Topics
- Maternal and fetal healthcare (12 papers)Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (10 papers)Language Development and Disorders (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Computer Science ApplicationsObstetrics and GynecologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Laura de Ruiter
34 papers receiving 974 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 306
- Computer Science Applications 292
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 280
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 218
- Social Psychology 197
Countries citing papers authored by Laura de Ruiter
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura de Ruiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura de Ruiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura de Ruiter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura de Ruiter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura de Ruiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura de Ruiter. The network helps show where Laura de Ruiter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura de Ruiter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura de Ruiter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura de Ruiter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura de Ruiter. Laura de Ruiter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 131 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Laura de Ruiter
Laura de Ruiter is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and fetal healthcare (12 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (10 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (292 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (280 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (218 citations). Laura de Ruiter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marina Umaschi Bers, Emily Relkin, Friederike Eyssel, Dieta Kuchenbrandt, Frank Hegel, Eva Pajkrt, Ben W. Mol, N. Kok, Jacqueline Limpens and Irene M. de Graaf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.