N. Kok
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Surgery
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Eva PajkrtBen W. MolIrene M. de GraafLaura de RuiterJacqueline LimpensBrent C. OpmeerJan DerksBrenda M. Kazemier
- Topics
- Maternal and fetal healthcare (8 papers)Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers)Pregnancy-related medical research (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Obstetrics and GynecologyPediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Journals
- Acta NeuropathologicaBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaSweden
In The Last Decade
N. Kok
8 papers receiving 306 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 291
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 279
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 126
- Surgery 32
- Clinical Psychology 8
Countries citing papers authored by N. Kok
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Kok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Kok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Kok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Kok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Kok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Kok. The network helps show where N. Kok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Kok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Kok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Kok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Kok. N. Kok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 91 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 72 | |
| 9 | 115 | |
| 10 | 24 |
About N. Kok
N. Kok is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and fetal healthcare (8 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (291 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (279 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (126 citations). N. Kok has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Eva Pajkrt, Ben W. Mol, Irene M. de Graaf, Laura de Ruiter, Jacqueline Limpens, Brent C. Opmeer, Jan Derks, Brenda M. Kazemier, Michel H. Hof and Anita C.J. Ravelli. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Neuropathologica, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.