Catherine Sackley

10.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
209 papers, 7.4k citations indexed

About

Catherine Sackley is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine Sackley has authored 209 papers receiving a total of 7.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 79 papers in Rehabilitation, 70 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 53 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Catherine Sackley's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (79 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (48 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (37 papers). Catherine Sackley is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (79 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (48 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (37 papers). Catherine Sackley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Catherine Sackley's co-authors include Carl E Clarke, Smitaa Patel, Katherine Deane, Catherine Lowe, Karen Barker, Keith Wheatley, Claire L Tomlinson, Nadina B. Lincoln, Natalie Ives and Michael Dewey and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Catherine Sackley

200 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Change in stroke incidence, mortality, case-fatality, severity, and risk factors in Oxfordshire, UK from 1981 to 2004 (Oxford Vascular Study)

2004 815 citations Catherine Sackley et al. profile →
Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson's disease

2013 327 citations Smitaa Patel, Carl E Clarke et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Catherine Sackley United Kingdom	43	2.2k	2.1k	1.9k	1.5k	1.4k	209	7.4k
Eline Lindeman Netherlands	57	3.0k 1.4×	3.9k 1.9×	1.6k 0.8×	1.7k 1.2×	946 0.7×	149	9.0k
Elliot J. Roth United States	47	1.9k 0.9×	3.8k 1.8×	1.2k 0.6×	2.2k 1.5×	1.1k 0.8×	187	7.4k
Sue Min Lai United States	36	1.9k 0.9×	3.4k 1.6×	931 0.5×	2.0k 1.3×	1.0k 0.7×	75	7.2k
Jacques van Limbeek Netherlands	45	1.7k 0.8×	1.7k 0.8×	1.1k 0.6×	866 0.6×	575 0.4×	132	6.8k
Carel G. M. Meskers Netherlands	48	1.4k 0.6×	1.6k 0.8×	1.0k 0.5×	1.2k 0.8×	863 0.6×	208	8.2k
Dorothy Farrar Edwards United States	48	2.2k 1.0×	2.7k 1.3×	2.0k 1.1×	1.9k 1.3×	435 0.3×	174	8.1k
Norine Foley Canada	45	1.8k 0.8×	2.6k 1.3×	1.2k 0.6×	1.7k 1.2×	462 0.3×	97	6.8k
Gustaaf J. Lankhorst Netherlands	46	2.7k 1.3×	4.1k 2.0×	2.3k 1.2×	1.8k 1.3×	737 0.5×	126	9.8k
Anne M. Moseley Australia	34	1.8k 0.8×	1.6k 0.8×	697 0.4×	768 0.5×	738 0.5×	89	8.8k
Mark Bayley Canada	47	2.0k 0.9×	2.9k 1.4×	1.7k 0.9×	3.3k 2.3×	800 0.6×	295	8.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Sackley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Sackley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Sackley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Sackley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Sackley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Sackley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Sackley. The network helps show where Catherine Sackley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Sackley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Sackley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Sackley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Sackley. Catherine Sackley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Williams, Nefyn, Monica Busse, Susanna Dodd, et al.. (2025). Effectiveness of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: results from the Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation phase III (FEMuR III) randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 15(5). e091603–e091603.

Sackley, Catherine, et al.. (2023). Stroke Survivor’s Satisfaction and Experience with Rehabilitation Services: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(16). 5413–5413. 1 indexed citations

Ayis, Salma, Aïcha Goubar, Lauren A Beaupré, et al.. (2023). Frequency, duration, and type of physiotherapy in the week after hip fracture surgery – analysis of implications for discharge home, readmission, survival, and recovery of mobility. Physiotherapy. 120. 47–59. 4 indexed citations

Fisher, Rebecca J, et al.. (2023). Barriers and facilitators in providing home-based rehabilitation for stroke survivors with severe disability in the UK: an online focus group study with multidisciplinary rehabilitation teams. BMJ Open. 13(8). e071217–e071217. 3 indexed citations

Youkee, Daniel, Sulaiman Lakoh, Anthony Rudd, et al.. (2023). Stroke in Sierra Leone. the stroke risk factors for people with HIV: A prospective case-control study. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 32(9). 107279–107279. 2 indexed citations

Jacobsen, Julie Sandell, Matthew O’Connell, Salma Ayis, et al.. (2022). Do changes in outcomes following primary and revision hip replacement differ and relate to markers of socioeconomic status? A 1-year population-based cohort study. Acta Orthopaedica. 93. 397–404. 6 indexed citations

Deen, Gibrilla F., Andrew Leather, Daniel Youkee, et al.. (2021). Exploring the experiences of stroke survivors, informal caregivers and healthcare providers in Sierra Leone: a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open. 11(12). e051276–e051276. 2 indexed citations

Williams, Nefyn, Susanna Dodd, Ben Hardwick, et al.. (2020). Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation—phase III (FEMuR III). BMJ Open. 10(10). e039791–e039791. 5 indexed citations

Bearne, Lindsay, Melissa Galea Holmes, Saskia Eddy, et al.. (2019). Motivating Structured walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a physiotherapist-led, behavioural change intervention versus usual care in adults with intermittent claudication. BMJ Open. 9(8). e030002–e030002. 10 indexed citations

10.

Sackley, Catherine, Christina H. Smith, Caroline Rick, et al.. (2018). Lee Silverman Voice Treatment versus standard speech and language therapy versus control in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomised controlled trial (PD COMM pilot). Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 4(1). 30–30. 32 indexed citations

11.

Bek, Judith, et al.. (2016). Conductive Education as a Method of Stroke Rehabilitation: A Single Blinded Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study. Stroke Research and Treatment. 2016. 1–6. 5 indexed citations

12.

Williams, Nefyn, Jessica Roberts, N Din, et al.. (2016). Fracture in the Elderly Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation (FEMuR): a phase II randomised feasibility study of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation package following hip fracture. BMJ Open. 6(10). e012422–e012422. 32 indexed citations

13.

Ford, Gary A., Amanda Farrin, Suzanne Hartley, et al.. (2015). DARS (Dopamine Augmented Rehabiltitation in Stroke): Results of a randomized controlled trial of co-careldopa treatment in addition to routine occupational and physical therapy after stroke. International Journal of Stroke. 10. 12–12. 2 indexed citations

14.

Turton, Ailie, Paul Cunningham, Emma Heron, et al.. (2013). Home-based reach-to-grasp training for people after stroke: study protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Trials. 14(1). 109–109. 27 indexed citations

15.

Sackley, Catherine, et al.. (2008). A Phase II exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a group mobility training and staff education intervention to promote urinary continence in UK care homes. 5 indexed citations

16.

Barker, Kathryn, et al.. (2007). Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta analysis of randomised controlled trials. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 66. 640–640. 3 indexed citations

17.

Berg, Maayken van den, et al.. (2006). A workshop to maintain residents' mobility and activity.. PubMed. 102(14). 32–4. 5 indexed citations

18.

Sackley, Catherine. (2001). Long-term Therapy for All Stroke Patients. Physiotherapy. 87(1). 54–54. 1 indexed citations

19.

Sackley, Catherine & Nadina B. Lincoln. (1996). Physiotherapy treatment for stroke patients: A survey of current practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 12(2). 87–96. 78 indexed citations

20.

Sackley, Catherine. (1990). Examples of Iniquity. Physiotherapy. 76(11). 692–692. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact