Kylie Rixon

10 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Kylie Rixon
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Public Administration 58
  • Safety Research 96
  • Clinical Psychology 163
  • General Health Professions 165
  • Family Practice 11
Replace Margaret Williams with:
Margaret Williams South Africa
Claire Gibbons United States
Kate Karban United Kingdom
Judith Wildfire United States
Rosemary Littlechild United Kingdom
Hannah Cooke United Kingdom
Mary Lober Aquilino United States
Rudolf Forster Austria
Philip Brigham United Kingdom
Elaine F. Cassidy United States
Kylie Rixon relative to Margaret Williams South Africa Margaret Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Margaret Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kylie Rixon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kylie Rixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kylie Rixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kylie Rixon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kylie Rixon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kylie Rixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kylie Rixon. The network helps show where Kylie Rixon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kylie Rixon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kylie Rixon Line = papers co-authored together Kylie Rixon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2005155
2 201481
3 200459
4 200546
5 202123
6 200712
7 20112
8 20241
9
Engaging the Public in Healthcare Decision Making. Citizens’ Jury on the Surgical Management of Obesity: Methods, Processes, and Verdicts
20141
10
Engaging the public in healthcare decision making: citizens' jury on emergency care services. Report 1: methods, processes, and verdicts
20121
11 20230

About Kylie Rixon

Kylie Rixon is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Public Administration, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper) and Career Development and Diversity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (58 citations), Safety Research (96 citations), Clinical Psychology (163 citations), General Health Professions (165 citations) and Family Practice (11 citations). Kylie Rixon has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yvonne Darlington, Judith A. Feeney, Jennifer A. Whitty, Julie Ratcliffe, Xanthe Golenko, Emily Lancsar, Mary McMahon, Holly Foot, Ian Scott and Nancy Sturman. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Patient, Child & Family Social Work, Journal of Medical Economics and Children and Youth Services Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact