Philip Brigham

420 total citations
11 papers, 309 citations indexed

About

Philip Brigham is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Brigham has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Philip Brigham's work include Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). Philip Brigham is often cited by papers focused on Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). Philip Brigham collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Philip Brigham's co-authors include Eric Emerson, Sheena Asthana, Graham Moon, Alex Gibson, Ian Diamond, Sarah Barnett, David Martín, Paul Roderick, Satheesh Gangadharan and Edward Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and Health & Place.

In The Last Decade

Philip Brigham

11 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Brigham United Kingdom 8 121 115 67 64 50 11 309
Leslie Clarke United States 13 131 1.1× 52 0.5× 140 2.1× 115 1.8× 36 0.7× 16 347
Helen J. Lee United States 7 137 1.1× 28 0.2× 32 0.5× 65 1.0× 28 0.6× 7 321
Brian Dodgeon United Kingdom 9 132 1.1× 45 0.4× 193 2.9× 111 1.7× 21 0.4× 20 373
Timothy Jelleyman New Zealand 6 178 1.5× 81 0.7× 129 1.9× 195 3.0× 23 0.5× 8 393
Marcela Movit United States 4 131 1.1× 26 0.2× 127 1.9× 74 1.2× 22 0.4× 4 323
Bernadette West United States 11 85 0.7× 56 0.5× 52 0.8× 90 1.4× 25 0.5× 22 271
Lisa M. Lapeyrouse United States 8 90 0.7× 96 0.8× 109 1.6× 130 2.0× 13 0.3× 11 330
Deborah A. Sullivan United States 10 100 0.8× 64 0.6× 46 0.7× 91 1.4× 29 0.6× 24 418
Shilpa Nayak United Kingdom 7 164 1.4× 33 0.3× 104 1.6× 32 0.5× 34 0.7× 7 303
Jacqueline Moodley South Africa 10 72 0.6× 47 0.4× 34 0.5× 81 1.3× 28 0.6× 21 311

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Brigham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Brigham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Brigham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Brigham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Brigham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Brigham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Brigham. The network helps show where Philip Brigham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Brigham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Brigham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Brigham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Brigham. Philip Brigham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Gangadharan, Satheesh, et al.. (2021). Current practice and adaptations being made for people with autism admitted to in-patient psychiatric services across the UK. BJPsych Open. 7(3). e102–e102. 8 indexed citations
2.
Shankar, Rohit, et al.. (2016). Patient- and carer-held health records: can they improve annual health checks for patients with learning disability?. British Journal of General Practice. 66(645). 210–212. 3 indexed citations
3.
Emerson, Eric & Philip Brigham. (2014). Exposure of children with developmental delay to social determinants of poor health: cross‐sectional case record review study. Child Care Health and Development. 41(2). 249–257. 40 indexed citations
4.
Emerson, Eric & Philip Brigham. (2014). The developmental health of children of parents with intellectual disabilities: Cross sectional study. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 35(4). 917–921. 48 indexed citations
5.
Emerson, Eric & Philip Brigham. (2013). Health behaviours and mental health status of parents with intellectual disabilities: cross sectional study. Public Health. 127(12). 1111–1116. 39 indexed citations
6.
Asthana, Sheena, et al.. (2003). The pursuit of equity in NHS resource allocation: should morbidity replace utilisation as the basis for setting health care capitations?. Social Science & Medicine. 58(3). 539–551. 33 indexed citations
7.
Asthana, Sheena, Alex Gibson, Graham Moon, & Philip Brigham. (2003). Allocating resources for health and social care: the significance of rurality. Health & Social Care in the Community. 11(6). 486–493. 32 indexed citations
9.
Martín, David, Philip Brigham, Paul Roderick, Sarah Barnett, & Ian Diamond. (2000). The (mis)Representation of Rural Deprivation. Environment and Planning A Economy and Space. 32(4). 735–751. 69 indexed citations
10.
Baines, Darrin, et al.. (1997). GP fundholding and prescribing in UK general practice. Public Health. 111(5). 321–325. 2 indexed citations
11.
Brigham, Philip, et al.. (1987). Standards for clinically based nursing research.. PubMed. 17(3). 4, 18–4, 18. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026