Koen van Bommel

761 citations
15 papers · 464 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Koen van Bommel

13 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Koen van Bommel
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Business and International Management 38
  • Strategy and Management 247
  • Marketing 147
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 98
  • Management Information Systems 77
Replace Martijn Boersma with:
Martijn Boersma Australia
Lara Bianchi United Kingdom
Héloïse Berkowitz France
Cecilia Grieco Italy
Samuel Nana Yaw Simpson Ghana
Jane Gibbon United Kingdom
Carole Donada France
Liselore Berghman Netherlands
Tiina Ritvala Finland
Howard Viney United Kingdom
Koen van Bommel relative to Martijn Boersma Australia Martijn Boersma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Martijn Boersma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Koen van Bommel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Koen van Bommel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koen van Bommel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koen van Bommel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Koen van Bommel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koen van Bommel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koen van Bommel. The network helps show where Koen van Bommel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Koen van Bommel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Koen van Bommel Line = papers co-authored together Koen van Bommel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2014152
2 2011129
3 2018103
4 202226
5 202215
6 201911
7 202010
8 20219
9 20223
10 20172
11 20211
12 20211
13 20081
14 20141
15 20250

About Koen van Bommel

Koen van Bommel is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Business and International Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (4 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (4 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (3 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (3 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper) and Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (38 citations), Strategy and Management (247 citations), Marketing (147 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (98 citations) and Management Information Systems (77 citations). Koen van Bommel has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include André Spicer, Andreas Rasche, Manuel Hensmans, Johan B. Wempe, Katinka Quintelier, Andrew Sturdy, Onno Bouwmeester, Neil Thompson and Michiel Verver. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Organization, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Organization & Environment and Organization Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact