Knight Biggerstaff

478 citations
16 papers · 68 indexed · h-index 5
Topics
Chinese history and philosophy (7 papers)Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (1 paper)Economic Zones and Regional Development (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Knight Biggerstaff

14 papers receiving 40 citations

Peers

Knight Biggerstaff
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 40
  • Political Science and International Relations 16
  • Cultural Studies 15
  • History 9
  • History and Philosophy of Science 7
Replace Jean Charlot with:
Jean Charlot France
George Dangerfield United States
Paul Knaplund United States
Linden A. Mander United States
Douglas Dakin United Kingdom
Charles E. Neu United States
John Lydenberg United States
Llewellyn Woodward
Edward P. Crapol United States
Norma Adams
Knight Biggerstaff relative to Jean Charlot France Jean Charlot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jean Charlot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Knight Biggerstaff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Knight Biggerstaff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Knight Biggerstaff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Knight Biggerstaff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Knight Biggerstaff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Knight Biggerstaff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Knight Biggerstaff. The network helps show where Knight Biggerstaff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Knight Biggerstaff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Knight Biggerstaff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Knight Biggerstaff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Knight Biggerstaff. Knight Biggerstaff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2
Nanking letters, 1949
1
3 0
4 1
5 3
6 12
7 1
8 0
9 25
10 7
11 5
12 2
13 2
14 1
15 1
16 5

About Knight Biggerstaff

Knight Biggerstaff is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 16 papers that have together received 68 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (7 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (1 paper) and Economic Zones and Regional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (15 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (7 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (40 citations). Knight Biggerstaff has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Albert Feuerwerker, Immanuel C. Y. Hsü, William L. Langer, John Κ. Fairbank, Werner Levi, Earl Swisher, Kwang-Ching Liu, Jerome Ch'en, Chauncey S. Goodrich and C. P. Fitzgerald. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Pacific Affairs and The Journal of Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026