George Dangerfield

432 total citations
12 papers, 48 citations indexed

About

George Dangerfield is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, George Dangerfield has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 48 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in George Dangerfield's work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers) and Australian History and Society (1 paper). George Dangerfield is often cited by papers focused on American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers) and Australian History and Society (1 paper). George Dangerfield collaborates with scholars based in United States. George Dangerfield's co-authors include Norman K. Risjord, Broadus Mitchell, Samuel Flagg Bemis, Bradford Perkins, Aubrey C. Land and Richard P. McCormick and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Southern History.

In The Last Decade

George Dangerfield

10 papers receiving 27 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
George Dangerfield United States	4	27	17	8	8	7	12	48
Jean Charlot France	5	26 1.0×	34 2.0×	5 0.6×	16 2.0×	9 1.3×	26	85
John Dos Passos	5	25 0.9×	17 1.0×	31 3.9×	20 2.5×	4 0.6×	30	96
Harry J. Carman United States	5	17 0.6×	22 1.3×	3 0.4×	7 0.9×	3 0.4×	19	62
Élie Halévy Canada	6	29 1.1×	29 1.7×	4 0.5×	19 2.4×	4 0.6×	14	78
Norma Adams	3	25 0.9×	25 1.5×	4 0.5×	20 2.5×	13 1.9×	5	95
Parker Tyler	5	23 0.9×	6 0.4×	8 1.0×	6 0.8×	4 0.6×	12	66
Hans Mayer United States	5	13 0.5×	6 0.4×	17 2.1×	7 0.9×	5 0.7×	51	65
John H. R. Polt United States	5	7 0.3×	11 0.6×	23 2.9×	14 1.8×	6 0.9×	27	58
Goldwin Smith United States	5	46 1.7×	38 2.2×	2 0.3×	14 1.8×	3 0.4×	27	83
Edward P. Crapol United States	6	44 1.6×	37 2.2×	5 0.6×	15 1.9×	11 1.6×	19	87

Countries citing papers authored by George Dangerfield

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Dangerfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Dangerfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Dangerfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Dangerfield

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Dangerfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Dangerfield. The network helps show where George Dangerfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Dangerfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Dangerfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Dangerfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Dangerfield. George Dangerfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Dangerfield, George, et al.. (2017). The Strange Death of Liberal England. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 13 indexed citations

2.

Dangerfield, George. (2011). The strange death of Liberal England 1910 - 1914. 3 indexed citations

3.

Dangerfield, George. (1976). The damnable question: A study in Anglo-Irish relations. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 12 indexed citations

4.

Dangerfield, George. (1972). Victoria's heir;: The education of a prince. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

5.

Dangerfield, George, et al.. (1966). The Awakening of American Nationalism, 1815-1828. Journal of American History. 53(3). 594–594. 1 indexed citations

6.

McCormick, Richard P. & George Dangerfield. (1965). The Awakening of American Nationalism, 1815-1828. The American Historical Review. 71(1). 309–309.

7.

Dangerfield, George & Bradford Perkins. (1965). Castlereagh and Adams: England and the United States, 1812-1823. The New England Quarterly. 38(4). 536–536. 1 indexed citations

8.

Risjord, Norman K. & George Dangerfield. (1965). The Awakening of American Nationalism, 1815-1828.. The Journal of Southern History. 31(3). 331–331. 5 indexed citations

9.

Dangerfield, George, et al.. (1962). The Twilight of Federalism: The Disintegration of the Federalist Party, 1815-1830. The American Historical Review. 67(4). 1061–1061. 5 indexed citations

10.

Mitchell, Broadus & George Dangerfield. (1961). Chancellor Robert R. Livingston of New York, 1746-1813. The Mississippi Valley Historical Review. 48(1). 103–103. 3 indexed citations

11.

Land, Aubrey C. & George Dangerfield. (1961). Chancellor Robert R. Livingston of New York, 1746-1813. The American Historical Review. 66(4). 1056–1056. 1 indexed citations

12.

Dangerfield, George & Samuel Flagg Bemis. (1956). John Quincy Adams and the Union. The New England Quarterly. 29(3). 400–400. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact