K.M. Maria John
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 5%
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Devanand L. LuthriaYingjian LuGansukh EnkhtaivanDoo Hwan KimMuthu ThiruvengadamSavithiry NatarajanChoong Hwan LeeJung Nam Choi
- Topics
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (8 papers)Tea Polyphenols and Effects (5 papers)Phytoestrogen effects and research (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryFood ChemistryInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
K.M. Maria John
30 papers receiving 694 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Plant Science 300
- Molecular Biology 226
- Food Science 208
- Biochemistry 167
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 131
Countries citing papers authored by K.M. Maria John
This map shows the geographic impact of K.M. Maria John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.M. Maria John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.M. Maria John more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K.M. Maria John
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.M. Maria John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.M. Maria John. The network helps show where K.M. Maria John may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K.M. Maria John
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K.M. Maria John. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K.M. Maria John based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K.M. Maria John. K.M. Maria John is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of individual catechin molecules:A comparative study between gallated and epimerized catechin molecules | 10 |
| 19 | Agrobacterium rhizogenes -mediated hairy root production in tea leaves (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) | 13 |
| 20 | 38 |
About K.M. Maria John
K.M. Maria John is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Food Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (8 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (5 papers) and Phytoestrogen effects and research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (167 citations), Food Science (208 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (83 citations). K.M. Maria John has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Devanand L. Luthria, Yingjian Lu, Gansukh Enkhtaivan, Doo Hwan Kim, Muthu Thiruvengadam, Savithiry Natarajan, Choong Hwan Lee, Jung Nam Choi, Seung‐Hyun Kim and Praveen Nagella. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.