Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effectiveness and Harms of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Spine Fusion
2013332 citationsKimberly Peterson et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly Peterson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly Peterson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly Peterson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly Peterson. The network helps show where Kimberly Peterson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly Peterson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly Peterson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly Peterson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly Peterson. Kimberly Peterson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Peterson, Kimberly. (2019). Victim or Villain?: The Effects of Rape Culture and Rape Myths on Justice for Rape Victims. Valparaiso University law review. 53(2). 467–508.1 indexed citations
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 2. Methods. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S7–S10.1 indexed citations
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 9. Temperature control. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S42–S45.1 indexed citations
7.
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 16. Glucose and nutrition. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S68–S71.1 indexed citations
8.
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 11. Barbiturates. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S49–S52.2 indexed citations
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 13. Hyperventilation. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S58–S60.3 indexed citations
13.
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 10. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S46–S48.2 indexed citations
14.
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 8. Hyperosmolar therapy. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S36–S41.3 indexed citations
15.
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 6. Advanced neuromonitoring. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S30–S32.2 indexed citations
16.
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 7. Neuroimaging. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S33–S35.1 indexed citations
17.
Kochanek, Patrick M., P. David Adelson, Stephen Ashwal, et al.. (2012). Chapter 1. Introduction. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 13. S3–S6.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.