Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report

199 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 199 indexed citations. Written by Christopher Krebs, Christine Lindquist, Marcus Berzofsky, Bonnie E. Shook‐Sa and Kimberly Peterson covering the research area of General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Gender Studies (173 citations), Sociology and Political Science (116 citations) and Health (100 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w72597876 →

Countries where authors are citing Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w72597876.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026