Kim Wright

3.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
56 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Kim Wright is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Wright has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 23 papers in Clinical Psychology and 20 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kim Wright's work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (25 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (15 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers). Kim Wright is often cited by papers focused on Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (25 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (15 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers). Kim Wright collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Kim Wright's co-authors include Dominic Lam, Edward Watkins, Pak C. Sham, Peter Hayward, Natalie C. Kerr, Jenifer A. Bright, Neil Smith, Willem Kuyken, Heather O’Mahen and Adrian Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and American Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Kim Wright

48 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Cost and Outcome of Behavioural Activation versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression (COBRA): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

2016 373 citations David Richards, David Ekers et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kim Wright United Kingdom	21	1.2k	948	507	241	229	56	1.9k
Raphael Kelvin United Kingdom	18	536 0.5×	1.5k 1.5×	298 0.6×	277 1.1×	203 0.9×	34	1.8k
Jane N. Kogan United States	22	1.0k 0.9×	735 0.8×	250 0.5×	212 0.9×	71 0.3×	52	1.8k
Justine Corry Australia	18	466 0.4×	545 0.6×	351 0.7×	270 1.1×	102 0.4×	26	1.2k
Lena Spangenberg Germany	20	479 0.4×	1.0k 1.1×	460 0.9×	532 2.2×	153 0.7×	70	1.8k
José Manuel García Montes Spain	25	932 0.8×	470 0.5×	195 0.4×	206 0.9×	126 0.6×	89	1.6k
Catherine Winsper United Kingdom	30	744 0.6×	1.6k 1.6×	302 0.6×	460 1.9×	95 0.4×	48	2.2k
Jodi M. Gonzalez United States	19	978 0.8×	812 0.9×	181 0.4×	452 1.9×	66 0.3×	37	1.7k
Jasper Palmier‐Claus United Kingdom	21	828 0.7×	895 0.9×	695 1.4×	348 1.4×	441 1.9×	57	1.9k
Patricia Marcy United States	21	1.0k 0.9×	445 0.5×	148 0.3×	356 1.5×	216 0.9×	29	1.5k
Claire M. Peterson United States	19	283 0.2×	1.3k 1.4×	329 0.6×	280 1.2×	318 1.4×	35	2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Wright

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Wright

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Wright. The network helps show where Kim Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Wright. Kim Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Azevedo, J., Alyson Dodd, Luisa Weiner, et al.. (2025). A perspective from the European Network for Bipolar and Emotion Regulation on research and intervention for emotion dysregulation in bipolar disorder: challenges and lessons learned. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 15. 1518106–1518106.

Wright, Kim, Lewis R. Elliott, Gordon Johnston, et al.. (2024). A qualitative exploration of the contribution of blue space to well‐being in the lives of people with severe mental illness. People and Nature. 6(2). 849–864. 8 indexed citations

Dunn, Barnaby D., Emily Widnall, Donald N. Reed, et al.. (2023). Preliminary clinical and cost effectiveness of augmented depression therapy versus cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of anhedonic depression (ADepT): a single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, pilot, randomised, controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine. 61. 102084–102084. 24 indexed citations

Steel, Craig, Kim Wright, Guy M. Goodwin, et al.. (2023). The IBER study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of imagery based emotion regulation for the treatment of anxiety in bipolar disorder. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders. 11(1). 27–27. 4 indexed citations

Yang, Ri‐Yao, Su Huang, Cai Huang, et al.. (2023). Fc-competent multispecific PDL-1/TIGIT/LAG-3 antibodies potentiate superior anti-tumor T cell response. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 9865–9865. 15 indexed citations

Wright, Kim, et al.. (2022). Adapted Behavioural Activation for Bipolar Depression: A Randomised Multiple Baseline Case Series. Brain Sciences. 12(10). 1407–1407. 2 indexed citations

O’Mahen, Heather, Adele M. Hayes, Mohammod Mostazir, et al.. (2021). A comparison of the effects of sudden gains and depression spikes on short- and long-term depressive symptoms in a randomized controlled trial of behavioral activation and cognitive behavioural therapy.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 89(12). 957–969. 4 indexed citations

Porter, Lucy, Fiona Gillison, Kim Wright, Frederick Verbruggen, & Natalia Lawrence. (2021). Exploring Strategies to Optimise the Impact of Food-Specific Inhibition Training on Children’s Food Choices. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 653610–653610. 9 indexed citations

Koenders, M. A., Alyson Dodd, Anke Karl, et al.. (2020). Understanding bipolar disorder within a biopsychosocial emotion dysregulation framework. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports. 2. 100031–100031. 11 indexed citations

10.

Steel, Craig, Kim Wright, Guy M. Goodwin, et al.. (2020). The IBER study: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of Imagery Based Emotion Regulation for the treatment of anxiety in bipolar disorder. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 6(1). 83–83. 9 indexed citations

11.

Dunn, Barnaby D., Heather O’Mahen, Kim Wright, & Gary Brown. (2019). A commentary on research rigour in clinical psychological science: How to avoid throwing out the innovation baby with the research credibility bath water in the depression field. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 120. 103417–103417. 12 indexed citations

12.

O’Mahen, Heather, Nicholas J. Moberly, & Kim Wright. (2018). Trajectories of Change in a Group Behavioral Activation Treatment for Severe, Recurrent Depression. Behavior Therapy. 50(3). 504–514. 2 indexed citations

13.

Wright, Kim, Alyson Dodd, Fiona C Warren, et al.. (2018). The clinical and cost effectiveness of adapted dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) for bipolar mood instability in primary care (ThrIVe-B programme): a feasibility study. Trials. 19(1). 560–560. 2 indexed citations

14.

Finning, Katie, David Richards, Lucy Moore, et al.. (2017). Cost and outcome of behavioural activation versus cognitive behavioural therapy for depression (COBRA): a qualitative process evaluation. BMJ Open. 7(4). e014161–e014161. 21 indexed citations

15.

Rhodes, Shelley, David Richards, David Ekers, et al.. (2014). Cost and outcome of behavioural activation versus cognitive behaviour therapy for depression (COBRA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 15(1). 29–29. 25 indexed citations

16.

Wright, Kim, et al.. (2013). Relating the Bipolar Spectrum to Dysregulation of Behavioural Activation: A Perspective from Dynamical Modelling. PLoS ONE. 8(5). e63345–e63345. 21 indexed citations

17.

Wright, Kim, Dominic Lam, & Richard G. Brown. (2008). Dysregulation of the behavioral activation system in remitted bipolar I disorder.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 117(4). 838–848. 24 indexed citations

18.

Wright, Kim & Gisli H. Gudjónsson. (2007). The development of a scale for measuring offence-related feelings of shame and guilt. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 18(3). 307–316. 21 indexed citations

19.

Lam, Dominic, Paul McCrone, Kim Wright, & Natalie C. Kerr. (2005). Cost-effectiveness of relapse-prevention cognitive therapy for bipolar disorder: 30-month study. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 186(6). 500–506. 41 indexed citations

20.

Watkins, Edward, Peter Hayward, Jenifer A. Bright, et al.. (2003). A Randomized Controlled Study of Cognitive Therapy for Relapse Prevention for Bipolar Affective Disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 60(2). 145–145. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact