John W. Loop

852 citations
38 papers · 626 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Loop

36 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

John W. Loop
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Neurology 191
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 7
  • Surgery 202
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 102
  • Emergency Medicine 43
Replace Sydney Heyman with:
Sydney Heyman United States
David M. Witten United States
Gökçe Kaan Ataç Türkiye
L Zaremba United States
H.C. Redman United States
Daniel J. Crusan United States
E.J. Adam United Kingdom
Vivek Mehta United States
Arvin R. Wali United States
Andrew F. McLaughlin Australia
John W. Loop relative to Sydney Heyman United States Sydney Heyman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Sydney Heyman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Loop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Loop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Loop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Loop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Loop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Loop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Loop. The network helps show where John W. Loop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Loop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Loop Line = papers co-authored together John W. Loop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971158
2 197353
3 199046
4 196444
5 196635
6 198330
7 197329
8 196428
9 197824
10 197219
11 197717
12 198916
13 197612
14 199012
15 196410
16 197510
17
CT ScoutView for skull fracture: substitute for skull films?
19828
18 19758
19 19897
20 19656

About John W. Loop

John W. Loop is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiology practices and education (11 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (9 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (2 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (191 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (7 citations), Surgery (202 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (102 citations) and Emergency Medicine (43 citations). John W. Loop has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Eldon L. Foltz, C M Shaw, Lucile E. White, G.E.M. Hall, Gerald R. Smith, Gilbert S. Omenn, L A Mack, David R. Haynor, R F Kilcoyne and H A King. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of Digital Imaging, New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact