Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Impact of an Augmented Reality Application on Learning Motivation of Students
2019340 citationsKevin Johnston, Jacques Ophoff et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Johnston
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Johnston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Johnston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Johnston more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Johnston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Johnston. The network helps show where Kevin Johnston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin Johnston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin Johnston.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin Johnston based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin Johnston. Kevin Johnston is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Johnston, Kevin, et al.. (2015). The Impact of Social Media Usage on the Cognitive Social Capital of University Students. Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. 18. 1.22 indexed citations
9.
Johnston, Kevin, et al.. (2013). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption of Open Source Software in Western Cape schools. The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (The University of the West Indies). 9(2). 64–84.14 indexed citations
10.
Johnston, Kevin, et al.. (2013). Use, Perception and Attitude of University Students Towards Facebook and Twitter. 16(3).25 indexed citations
11.
Johnston, Kevin, et al.. (2012). Exploring the roles of people, governance and technology in organizational readiness for emerging technologies. DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University). 4(3). 2.7 indexed citations
Johnston, Kevin, et al.. (2006). Key Issues for Information Officers in South Africa. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 425.
18.
Ng’ambi, Dick & Kevin Johnston. (2006). An ICT-Mediated Constructivist Approach for Increasing Academic Support and Teaching Critical Thinking Skills. Educational Technology & Society. 9(3). 244–253.20 indexed citations
Johnston, Kevin. (2004). A Concept of Operations for an Integrated Weather Forecast Process to Support the National Airspace System. 11th Conference on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace and the 22nd Conference on Severe Local Storms.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.