Ken Gemes

1.1k total citations
36 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Ken Gemes is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ken Gemes has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Philosophy, 16 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ken Gemes's work include Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (17 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (9 papers). Ken Gemes is often cited by papers focused on Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (17 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (9 papers). Ken Gemes collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Ken Gemes's co-authors include Simon May, Christopher Janaway, Kathleen Marie Higgins, John Richardson, Christine Swanton, Hans Sluga, Julian Young, Maudemarie Clark, Jeff Malpas and Keith Ansell Pearson and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophy of Science and Noûs.

In The Last Decade

Ken Gemes

35 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Ken Gemes
Richard Gaskin United Kingdom
Michael Beaney United Kingdom
Robert Stoothoff United Kingdom
Gillian Russell United States
Craig Bourne United Kingdom
W. D. Hart United States
Dorothy Grover United States
Richard Gaskin United Kingdom
Ken Gemes
Citations per year, relative to Ken Gemes Ken Gemes (= 1×) peers Richard Gaskin

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Gemes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Gemes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Gemes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Gemes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Gemes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Gemes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Gemes. The network helps show where Ken Gemes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ken Gemes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ken Gemes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ken Gemes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ken Gemes. Ken Gemes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gemes, Ken. (2023). Who are Nietzsche’s Christians?. Inquiry. 66(7). 1307–1334. 3 indexed citations
2.
Gemes, Ken. (2021). The Biology of Evil: Nietzsche on Degeneration (Entartung) and Jewification (Verjüdung). The Journal of Nietzsche Studies. 52(1). 1–25. 4 indexed citations
3.
Young, Julian, Hans Sluga, Ken Gemes, et al.. (2014). Individual and Community in Nietzsche's Philosophy. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 7 indexed citations
4.
Gemes, Ken. (2013). Life’s Perspectives. Oxford University Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations
5.
May, Simon & Ken Gemes. (2009). Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy. Oxford University Press eBooks. 55 indexed citations
6.
Gemes, Ken. (2009). Freud and Nietzsche on Sublimation. The Journal of Nietzsche Studies. 38(1). 38–59. 19 indexed citations
8.
Gemes, Ken. (2009). Janaway on Perspectivism. European Journal of Philosophy. 17(1). 101–112. 3 indexed citations
9.
Gemes, Ken. (2007). Strangers to Ourselves: Nietzsche on The Will to Truth, The Scientific Spirit, Free Will, and Genuine Selfhood. SAS-Space (University of London). 2 indexed citations
10.
Gemes, Ken. (2006). Content and Watkin's Account of Natural Axiomatizations. dialectica. 60(1). 85–92. 2 indexed citations
11.
Pearson, Keith Ansell, Babette Babich, Daniel Conway, et al.. (2006). Nietzsche's on the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays. 8 indexed citations
12.
Gemes, Ken. (2005). Hypothetico-Deductivism: Incomplete But Not Hopeless. Erkenntnis. 63(1). 139–147. 7 indexed citations
13.
Gemes, Ken. (2001). Postmodernism's Use and Abuse of Nietzsche. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 62(2). 337–360. 17 indexed citations
14.
Gemes, Ken. (1997). A New Theory of Content II: Model Theory and Some Alternatives. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 26(4). 449–476. 24 indexed citations
15.
Gemes, Ken. (1994). Explanation, Unification, & Content. 1 indexed citations
16.
Gemes, Ken. (1994). Explanation, Unification, and Content. Noûs. 28(2). 225–225. 10 indexed citations
17.
Gemes, Ken. (1993). Hypothetico-Deductivism, Content, and the Natural Axiomatization of Theories. Philosophy of Science. 60(3). 477–487. 33 indexed citations
18.
Gemes, Ken. (1990). Horwich, Hempel, and Hypothetico-Deductivism. Philosophy of Science. 57(4). 699–702. 7 indexed citations
19.
Gemes, Ken. (1989). A Refutation of Popperian Inductive Scepticism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 40(2). 183–184. 2 indexed citations
20.
Gemes, Ken. (1983). A refutation of inductive scepticism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 61(4). 434–438. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026