Paul S. Loeb

483 total citations
24 papers, 106 citations indexed

About

Paul S. Loeb is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul S. Loeb has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 106 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Philosophy, 3 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Paul S. Loeb's work include Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (17 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (12 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers). Paul S. Loeb is often cited by papers focused on Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (17 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (12 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers). Paul S. Loeb collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Paul S. Loeb's co-authors include Keith Ansell Pearson, Daniel Conway, Gary Shapiro, Alan D. Schrift, Babette Babich, Yirmiyahu Yovel, David Owen, Ken Gemes, Wolfgang Müller-Lauter and Salim Kemal and has published in prestigious journals such as International Studies in Philosophy, Journal of the history of philosophy and The Journal of Nietzsche Studies.

In The Last Decade

Paul S. Loeb

20 papers receiving 77 citations

Peers

Paul S. Loeb
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Philosophy 93
  • Literature and Literary Theory 19
  • Clinical Psychology 12
  • Sociology and Political Science 11
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 7
Replace Werner Stegmaier with:
Werner Stegmaier Germany
Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius
Wolfgang Müller-Lauter
Sylvie Le Bon de Beauvoir Austria
Willi Goetschel Canada
Andreas Urs Sommer Germany
H. P. Blavatsky
Emil Angehrn Switzerland
Joseph S. Catalano United States
Elke D’hoker Belgium
Werner Stegmaier Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Paul S. Loeb
Paul S. Loeb · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Paul S. Loeb
Paul S. Loeb · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Paul S. Loeb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul S. Loeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul S. Loeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul S. Loeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul S. Loeb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul S. Loeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul S. Loeb. The network helps show where Paul S. Loeb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul S. Loeb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul S. Loeb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul S. Loeb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul S. Loeb. Paul S. Loeb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 1
5 3
6 2
7 4
8
Music entrepreneurship: An indispensable part of tertiary music curricula
3
9
Nietzsche’s Transhumanism
2
10 1
11 36
12 3
13
Nietzsche's on the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays
8
14 10
15 0
16 2
17
Time, Power, and Superhumanity
6
18 7
19 8
20 6

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026