Maudemarie Clark
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Education
- Co-authors
- Brian LeiterJeff MalpasDaniel BreazealeKathleen Marie HigginsRolf‐Peter HorstmannRüdiger BittnerJohn RichardsonKen Gemes
- Topics
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (24 papers)Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (11 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGerman Studies ReviewThe Monist
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Maudemarie Clark
23 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Philosophy 356
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
- Sociology and Political Science 52
- Literature and Literary Theory 36
- Education 26
Countries citing papers authored by Maudemarie Clark
This map shows the geographic impact of Maudemarie Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maudemarie Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maudemarie Clark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maudemarie Clark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maudemarie Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maudemarie Clark. The network helps show where Maudemarie Clark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maudemarie Clark
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maudemarie Clark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maudemarie Clark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maudemarie Clark. Maudemarie Clark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Review of Friedrich Nietzsche, Rolf-Peter Horstmann (eds.), Judith Norman (eds.), Beyond Good and Evil | 0 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 152 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Maudemarie Clark
Maudemarie Clark is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (24 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (11 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (356 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (53 citations) and General Social Sciences (11 citations). Maudemarie Clark has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian Leiter, Jeff Malpas, Daniel Breazeale, Kathleen Marie Higgins, Rolf‐Peter Horstmann, Rüdiger Bittner, John Richardson, Ken Gemes, Raymond Geuss and Alexander Nehamas. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, German Studies Review and The Monist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.