Fadia M. Narchet

716 citations
8 papers · 407 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Fadia M. Narchet

8 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Fadia M. Narchet
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Social Psychology 355
  • Clinical Psychology 201
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 160
  • Sociology and Political Science 150
  • Law 33
Replace Kimberly D. Richman with:
Kimberly D. Richman United States
Steven M. Kleinman United States
Hayley M. D. Cleary United States
Steven A. Drizin United States
Colin Clarke United Kingdom
Andre Kehn United States
Stamatis Elntib United Kingdom
Jennifer J. Ratcliff United States
Olga Tsoudis United States
Ellen Wessel Norway
Fadia M. Narchet relative to Kimberly D. Richman United States Kimberly D. Richman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Kimberly D. Richman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fadia M. Narchet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fadia M. Narchet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fadia M. Narchet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fadia M. Narchet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fadia M. Narchet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fadia M. Narchet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fadia M. Narchet. The network helps show where Fadia M. Narchet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Fadia M. Narchet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fadia M. Narchet Line = papers co-authored together Fadia M. Narchet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2005221
2 201087
3 201459
4 201420
5 20189
6 20118
7 20212
8
Modeling the role of investigator bias, interrogation techniques, and suspect decision -making on the likelihood of confession
20051

About Fadia M. Narchet

Fadia M. Narchet is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (355 citations), Clinical Psychology (201 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (160 citations), Sociology and Political Science (150 citations) and Law (33 citations). Fadia M. Narchet has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Melissa B. Russano, Christian A. Meissner, Saul M. Kassin, Steven M. Kleinman and Carlos A. Cuevas. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Cognitive Psychology, Law and Human Behavior, Violence and Victims, Psychological Science and Violence Against Women.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact