Kathleen Curtiss
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Evan McBroomChristine FoxKimberly BurkhartJeanne BrockmyerJeanne B. FunkKelly SchochVandana ShashiStephen R. Hooper
- Topics
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers)Congenital heart defects research (3 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- PEDIATRICSJournal of Experimental Social PsychologyJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesGhana
In The Last Decade
Kathleen Curtiss
7 papers receiving 777 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 349
- Sociology and Political Science 305
- Human-Computer Interaction 221
- Social Psychology 124
- Cognitive Neuroscience 121
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Curtiss
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Curtiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Curtiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Curtiss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Curtiss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Curtiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Curtiss. The network helps show where Kathleen Curtiss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Curtiss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Curtiss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Curtiss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Curtiss. Kathleen Curtiss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | The development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playingbreakdown → | 651 |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 31 |
About Kathleen Curtiss
Kathleen Curtiss is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Safety Research and Gender Studies, having authored 7 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Congenital heart defects research (3 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (221 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (349 citations) and Applied Psychology (59 citations). Kathleen Curtiss has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Evan McBroom, Christine Fox, Kimberly Burkhart, Jeanne Brockmyer, Jeanne B. Funk, Kelly Schoch, Vandana Shashi, Stephen R. Hooper, Andrew S. Allen and Matcheri S. Keshavan. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.