Citations per year, relative to Nathaniel Hawthorne Nathaniel Hawthorne (= 1×)
peers
Richard Poirier
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Hawthorne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Hawthorne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Hawthorne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Hawthorne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Hawthorne. The network helps show where Nathaniel Hawthorne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel Hawthorne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel Hawthorne.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel Hawthorne based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel Hawthorne. Nathaniel Hawthorne is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel, et al.. (2018). The historian's Scarlet letter : reading Nathaniel Hawthorne's masterpiece as social and cultural history. Praeger eBooks.
2.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel, et al.. (2016). The Urban Gothic Vision of Colson Whitehead's The Intuitionist (1999). African American Review. 40(2). 359.3 indexed citations
Hawthorne, Nathaniel & Cindy Weinstein. (2008). The Scarlet Letter. Oxford University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
8.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel & Leland S. Person. (2005). The scarlet letter and other writings : authoritative texts, contexts, criticism. W.W. Norton eBooks.2 indexed citations
9.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel, et al.. (2003). Les héros de la mythologie grecque.
10.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. (1996). Tales and sketches : including Twice-told, Mosses from an old manse, and The snow-image.
11.
Paz, Octavio & Nathaniel Hawthorne. (1994). Arenas movedizas ; La hija de Rappaccini. Alianza eBooks.1 indexed citations
12.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. (1993). La letra escarlata.
13.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel, et al.. (1978). Nathaniel Hawthorne : a descriptive bibliography. University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
14.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel & Fulton T. Crews. (1977). Great Short Works of Nathaniel Hawthorne. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
15.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel, et al.. (1976). A letra escarlate.
16.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel, et al.. (1962). The centenary edition of the works of Nathaniel Hawthorne.109 indexed citations
17.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel, et al.. (1962). The scarlet letter : an annotated text, backgrounds and sources, essays in criticism.3 indexed citations
18.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. (1962). Scarlet Letter : A Romance. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).17 indexed citations
19.
Levin, David, et al.. (1960). What Happened in Salem? Documents Pertaining to the Seventeenth-Century Witchcraft Trials.. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
20.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel, et al.. (1954). La lettre écarlate. Gallimard eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.