David V. Erdman
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History top 1%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- William BlakeHarold BloomRobert F. GlecknerAlfred NeumeyerJames ChandlerSamuel Taylor ColeridgeCarl WoodringW. H. Stevenson
- Topics
- Moravian Church and William Blake (22 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of Aesthetics and Art CriticismThe Modern Language Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David V. Erdman
26 papers receiving 268 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Literature and Literary Theory 303
- Sociology and Political Science 150
- History 121
- Philosophy 71
- Religious studies 64
Countries citing papers authored by David V. Erdman
This map shows the geographic impact of David V. Erdman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David V. Erdman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David V. Erdman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David V. Erdman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David V. Erdman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David V. Erdman. The network helps show where David V. Erdman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David V. Erdman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David V. Erdman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David V. Erdman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David V. Erdman. David V. Erdman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blakebreakdown → | 263 |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | The four zoas by William Blake : a photographic facsimile of the manuscript with commentary on the illuminations | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Essays on his times : in the Morning Post and the Courier | 14 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | The Poetry and Prose of William Blake. | 71 |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About David V. Erdman
David V. Erdman is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Moravian Church and William Blake (22 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (303 citations), Religious studies (64 citations) and History (121 citations). David V. Erdman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Blake, Harold Bloom, Robert F. Gleckner, Alfred Neumeyer, James Chandler, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Carl Woodring, W. H. Stevenson, Anna Balakian and Morton D. Paley. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.