J. Paul Hunter
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- History top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Margaret Anne DoodyRoger LonsdaleMary ShelleyBridget FowlerBarbara Kiefer LewalskiJack CanfieldDeidre LynchPat Rogers
- Topics
- Canadian Identity and History (2 papers)Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
J. Paul Hunter
23 papers receiving 126 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Literature and Literary Theory 162
- History 78
- Anthropology 61
- Sociology and Political Science 55
- Philosophy 45
Countries citing papers authored by J. Paul Hunter
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Paul Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Paul Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Paul Hunter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Paul Hunter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Paul Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Paul Hunter. The network helps show where J. Paul Hunter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Paul Hunter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Paul Hunter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Paul Hunter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Paul Hunter. J. Paul Hunter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A companion to the English novel | 1 |
| 2 | Frankenstein : the 1818 text, contexts, criticism | 4 |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Frankenstein : the 1818 text, contexts, nineteenth-century responses, modern criticism | 9 |
| 6 | New worlds of literature : writings from America's many cultures | 7 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 132 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | The reluctant pilgrim : Defoe's emblematic method and quest for form in Robinson Crusoe | 37 |
| 20 | 3 |
About J. Paul Hunter
J. Paul Hunter is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Museology and Cultural Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Canadian Identity and History (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers) and Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (162 citations), History (78 citations) and Anthropology (61 citations). J. Paul Hunter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Anne Doody, Roger Lonsdale, Mary Shelley, Bridget Fowler, Barbara Kiefer Lewalski, Jack Canfield, Deidre Lynch, Pat Rogers, Paula R. Backscheider and John Richetti. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, College Composition and Communication and Critical Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.