Katherine Tsai
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sawssan R. AhmedMaryam Kia‐KeatingBruce F. ChorpitaAlayna L. ParkLauren Brookman‐FrazeeMary J. Baker-EriczénAubyn C. StahmerJennifer L. Krull
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers)Child Welfare and Adoption (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Statistical AssociationJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyLight Science & Applications
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Katherine Tsai
19 papers receiving 529 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Clinical Psychology 405
- General Health Professions 105
- Cognitive Neuroscience 102
- Sociology and Political Science 92
- Social Psychology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Tsai
This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Tsai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Tsai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Tsai. The network helps show where Katherine Tsai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine Tsai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine Tsai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine Tsai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine Tsai. Katherine Tsai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 135 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | How to Create International Law: The Case of Internet Freedom In China | 3 |
| 17 | 114 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 106 |
About Katherine Tsai
Katherine Tsai is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (405 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations) and Speech and Hearing (40 citations). Katherine Tsai has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sawssan R. Ahmed, Maryam Kia‐Keating, Bruce F. Chorpita, Alayna L. Park, Lauren Brookman‐Frazee, Mary J. Baker-Ericzén, Aubyn C. Stahmer, Jennifer L. Krull, Andrea Letamendi and Angela W. Chiu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Light Science & Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.