Katharine Charsley

1.6k citations
35 papers · 918 indexed · h-index 19

Katharine Charsley

34 papers receiving 831 citations

Peers

Katharine Charsley
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Demography 357
  • Sociology and Political Science 817
  • Gender Studies 125
  • Clinical Psychology 137
  • Political Science and International Relations 119
Replace Anna Amelina with:
Anna Amelina Germany
Maruja M.B. Asis Singapore
Nicola Mai United Kingdom
Amparo González‐Ferrer Spain
Ellie Vasta Australia
Leah Schmalzbauer United States
Saskia Bonjour Netherlands
Elisabetta Zontini United Kingdom
Derek McGhee United Kingdom
Virinder S. Kalra United Kingdom
Katharine Charsley relative to Anna Amelina Germany Anna Amelina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Anna Amelina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katharine Charsley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katharine Charsley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katharine Charsley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katharine Charsley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katharine Charsley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katharine Charsley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katharine Charsley. The network helps show where Katharine Charsley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Katharine Charsley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katharine Charsley Line = papers co-authored together Katharine Charsley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20232
3 202310
4 20185
5 20184
6 20172
7 201652
8 201621
9
The Invisible (Migrant) Man
20153
10 201574
11 201322
12
Marriages of convenience or inconvenient marriages: regulating spousal migration to Britain
201218
13 201235
14 201230
15 200911
16 20086
17 200662
18 200671
19 200521
20 200024

About Katharine Charsley

Katharine Charsley is a scholar working on Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 35 papers that have together received 918 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration and Labor Dynamics (28 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (20 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (14 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Sex work and related issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (357 citations), Sociology and Political Science (817 citations), Gender Studies (125 citations), Clinical Psychology (137 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (119 citations). Katharine Charsley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alison Shaw, Sarah Spencer, Helena Wray, Anika Liversage, Marta Bolognani, Kaveri Qureshi, Steve Fenton, Nicholas Van Hear, Michaela Benson and Ross Bond. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Comparative Migration Studies, Men and Masculinities, Global Networks and Ethnic and Racial Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026